REDDY APPALA NAIDU v. BONDI PALLI PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 20325/2013 Between:
1. REDDY APPALA NAIDU,, S/O. LATE KANNAM NAIDU, HINDU AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, RTD. AS SECRETARY, R/O PLOT NO.19/A, SIMHADRI NAGAR, BALAJI RING ROAD, VIZIANAGARAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
BONDI PALLI PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT, BONDI PALLI MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
BONDI PALLI PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, BONDI PALLI MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, THE DISTRICT CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK, VIZIANAGARAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
THE DIVISIONAL COOPERATIVE OFFICER, VIZIANAGARAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus under Art. 226 of Constitution of India, declaring the action of the respondents though the petitioner is entitled towards his retiral benefits 2 of Gratuity and Leave Encashment the society without releasing the amounts and prolonging the matter any valid reason and kept pending years together is as illegal, improper and arbitrary IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 24931 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to release the petitioner's terminal benefits of the Gratuity and Leave Encashment amounts with immediate effect Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. A PADMA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. K SRINIVASA MURTHY
2. GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following: Order:- 3 The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has challenged the inaction on the part of the respondents in releasing the service benefits including gratuity and encashment of leave.
2. This Court, vide order dated 11.07.2013, directed the 1st respondent Society to release the amounts due and payable to the petitioner within a period of four (04) weeks. In default, a further direction was issued to the 1st respondent not to release the salary payable to the 2nd respondent.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in pursuance of the directions of this Court, the respondents have released the service benefits and as such the writ petition may be closed.
4. Recording the same, this writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N
09.03.2026 PNS
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 09 Mar 2026. The bench was HARINATH N.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.