BEZAWADA NAGAMALLESWARA RAO v. THE STATE OF AP
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 14, 21, 226
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. The respondents are directed to release the admitted/legally entitled amount to the petitioner at the earliest and at any rate, within a period of two (02) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this…
Judgment
Cause title
paying the of amount of Rs.9,53,021/- (Nine Lakhs Fifty Three Thousand Twenty one Rupees only) even after finalizing the bills, payable to the petitioner after the successful completion of the execution of work i.e., (1) Construction of CC Drain from MPPS Main School to Jonnalagadda Sambaiah house in Chandrala GP of Mylavaram (M) (2) Construction of CC Drain from Rayala Basavaiah house to Nimmaadda Srihari house and Rayala Venkateswara Rao (H) to Gandepalli Raghavulu (H) in Chandrala GP of Mylavaram (M), 3) Construction of CC Drain from Ambati Raghavulu house to Ricemill in Chandrala GP of Mylavaram(M), which were taken up under Agreement No- 29/2023-24, dated 29.09.2023 of the Deputy Executive Engineer, RWS and. S Sub- Division, Mylavaram as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unreasonable and violative of fundamental rights guaranteed to the Petitioner under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to make the payment of Rs. Rs.9,53,021/- with accrued interest to the petitioner in respect of execution of the above said work. IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to make the payment of Rs. Rs.9,53,021/- with accrued interest to the petitioner in respect of execution of the above said work called; (1) Construction of CC Drain from MPPS Main School to Jonnalagadda Sambaiah house in Chandrala GP of Mylavaram (M), (2) Construction of CC Drain from Rayala Basavaiah house to Nimmaadda Srihari house and Rayala Venkateswara Rao (H) to Gandepalli Raghavulu (H) in Chandrala GP of Mylavaram (M), (3) Construction of CC Drain from Ambati Raghavulu house to Ricemill in Chandrala GP of Mylavaram(M), which were taken up under Agreement No- 29/2023-24, dated 29.09.2023 of the Deputy Executive Engineer, RWS and S Sub-Division, Mylavaram duly approved by the respondents forthwith, pending disposal of the main writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. BALAJI MEDAMALLI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Non payment of bills for the works executed by the petitioner for construction of CC Drain from MPPS Main School to Jonnalagadda Sambaiah house in Chandrala GP of Mylavaram Mandal, is the grievance of the petitioner.
Heard Sri Annamneedi Balakrishna, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Naga Chandrika, learned Assistant Government Pleader Panchayat Raj Rural Development and Assistant Government Pleader for Finance Planning for the respondents.
Smt. Naga Chandrika, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions dated 14.11.2025, submitted that the petitioner is claiming gross amount of Rs.10,63,631/- but, he is entitled to pay a net amount of Rs.9,53,021/- after statutory deductions, but, due to non-availability of grant, the bills were not uploaded in NIDHI portal and soon after release of the grant, the bills will be uploaded in NIDHI portal for payment. She further submitted that the authorities addressed a letter to the Collector-cum-District Magistrate, NTR District, for taking necessary action for release of GGMP funds.
To the said submission, learned counsel for the petitioner reported no objection and agreed to accept the amount admitted by the respondents.
Taking into consideration, the submissions of both the learned counsel, as the authorities are ready to pay the legally entitled amount to the petitioner, without going into the merits and demerits of the matter, this Court is inclined to dispose of the Writ Petition at admission stage.
Operative part
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. The respondents are directed to release the admitted/legally entitled amount to the petitioner at the earliest and at any rate, within a period of two (02) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It would be open to the petitioner to agitate its claim for interest, if any, payable by the respondents, if he is so advised, in an appropriate forum. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. Date: 04th December, 2025 KSN/RMR _____________________ RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J 295 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITON No.31503 of 2025 Date: 04.12.2025 KSN/RMR
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 14, 21, 226; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 04 Dec 2025. The bench was RAVI CHEEMALAPATI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.