K PRASANNA v. DR GUNDEBOINA MURALIDHAR
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 397, 401
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In that view, since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner and the respondent Nos. 1 to 9, this interlocutory application vide I.A. No.1 of 2023 is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions…
Judgment
Cause title
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATI ...RESPONDENT(S)
: stated Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances the affidavit CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased topleased to set-aside the Judgment dated 17.11.2016 passed in SC. No. 331 of 2010 by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Proddatur which was confirmed by the Judgment dated 26-07-2023 passed in Crl. A. No. 05 of 2017 by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Kadapa and pass support of IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to condone the delay of 22 days in filing the revision against the judgement passed by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Kadapa in Crl. A. No. 05 of 2017 dated 26.07.2023 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with the Certified copy of the order SC.No.331/2010 on the file of Assistant Sessions Judge, Proddatur dated 17.11.2016 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. S V RUTHVIK Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
2. THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO I.A.No.1 of 2023 in/and Crl.R.C.No.1121 of 2023 The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The Interlocutory application has been filed to condone the delay of 22 days in filing the revision against the judgment passed by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Kadapa in Crl.A.No.05 of 2017 dated 26.07.2023.
Today, when the matter taken up for hearing, is no representation for the petitioner and respondent Nos. 1 to 9.
In that view, since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner and the respondent Nos. 1 to 9, this interlocutory application vide I.A. No.1 of 2023 is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Revision Case shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 23.06.2026 JLSR Speaking Reportable Reasoned Non-reportable THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO I.A.No.1 of 2023 in/and Crl.R.C.No.1121 of 2023
23.06.2026 139 JLSR
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — ss. 397, 401; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 23 Jun 2026. The bench was ASSISTANT SESSIONS, ADDITIONAL, SESSIONS, ADDITIONAL SESSIONS.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.