CH SARADA v. THE STATE OF AP
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 06 Jan 2025
- Bench
- SUBBA REDDY SATTI
Outcome
Dismissed
Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 14, 16, 21, 226
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Judgment
Cause title
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 29342/2023 Between:
1. CH SARADA, W/O NAGA RAJU, AGE 51 YEARS, WORKING AS A TOWN PLANNING SUPERVISOR AT PONNURU MUNICIPALITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT PUBLIC HEALTH, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMRAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DIRECTOR OF TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MGM CAPITAL, GROUND FLOOR, NRI HOSPITAL NH FLY OVER, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, AMARAVATI. ...RESPONDENT(S)
: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature in WRIT of MANDAMUS aggrieved by the action of the Respondent in not considering the Petitioner Promotion to the post of Town Planning Officer, at 2nd Respondent Director of Town and Country Planning which is highly illegal, unjust, arbitrary and contrary to law and violations of Principles of Natural Justice and contrary Articles 14, 16 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to forthwith consider the case of 2 Petitioner promotion to the post of Town Planning Officer as per GO Ms No 257 General Administration (SER.C) Dated 10.6.1999 without referring the pending Departmental Proceedings of 2nd Respondent vide Charge Memo No 1028169/2019/M2 Dated 29.10.2021 and 1st Respondent Go Rt No 493 Dated 7.8.2023 in ongoing DPC and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to forthwith consider the case of Petitioner promotion to the post of Town Planning Officer as per GO Ms No 257 General Administration (SER.C) Dated 10.6.1999 without referring the pending Departmental Proceedings of 2nd Respondent vide Charge Memo No 1028169/2019/M2 Dated 29.10.2021 and 1st Respondent Go Rt No 493 Dated 7.8.2023 in ongoing DPC, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. S SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES IV The Court made the following: ::
ORDER ::
Operative part
Sri J.S. Venkatesh, learned counsel representing Sri Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in this case, shall stand closed. Date: 06.01.2025 TVN ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI 3 189 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.29342 OF 2023 Date: 06.01.2025 TVN
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 14, 16, 21, 226; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 06 Jan 2025. The bench was SUBBA REDDY SATTI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.