Bench Sr.No:-15 v. The State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Andhra Pradesh Municipal Corporations Act, 1994 ss. 401, 405, 406
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Ordered accordingly. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J AMD 3 50 HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE & HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 1026 of…
Judgment
Sri Venkateswara Rao Gudapati Learned Government Pleader Municipal Administration and Urban learned Government Development, Pleader for Revenue, Sri M. Krishna Rao, learned Standing Counsel for Kakinada Municipal Corporation. CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 22nd September 2025 P C : Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the matter can be disposed of with liberty to Kakinada Municipal Corporation to pass an appropriate speaking order on the explanation rendered by petitioner/appellant to the notice issued under Sections 401, 405 and 406 of the Andhra Pradesh Municipal Corporations Act, 1994 and further that in case an order is passed by the authorities which is adverse to the interests of the petitioner/appellant herein, the same be not acted upon for a period of two (2) weeks with a view to enable the petitioner/appellant to work out his remedies. 2
Ordered accordingly. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J AMD 3 50 HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE & HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 1026 of 2025 Dt:22.09.2025 AMD
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Andhra Pradesh Municipal Corporations Act, 1994 — ss. 401, 405, 406.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 22 Sep 2025. The bench was DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, RAVI CHEEMALAPATI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.