DATLA SRUJAN BHUPATI VARMA v. THE STATE OF AP
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 24542/2025 WRIT PETITION NO: 24542/2025 Between: DATLA SRUJAN BHUPATI VARMA, S/O. DATIA SATYANARAYANA 1. DATLA SRUJAN BHUPATI VARMA, S/O. DATIA SATYANARAYANA DATLA SRUJAN BHUPATI VARMA, S/O. DATIA SATYANARAYANA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, OCC I YEAR MBBS (2021 BATCH), RAJU, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, OCC I YEAR MBBS (2021 BATCH), RAJU, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, OCC I YEAR MBBS (2021 BATCH), MANDAL, GUDIWADA, MANDAL, GUDIWADA, 91, RAVIKAMATHAM R/O. H.NO. 1-91, RAVIKAMATHAM MANDAL, GUDIWADA, 91, RAVIKAMATHAM VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH-531025. VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER ...PETITIONER AND
THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HEALTH, THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HEALTH, MEDICAL AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT MEDICAL AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT MEDICAL AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. BUILDINGS, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. BUILDINGS, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. THE NATIONAL MEDICAL COMMISSION, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, 2. THE NATIONAL MEDICAL COMMISSION, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, THE NATIONAL MEDICAL COMMISSION, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, SATARKTA BHAWAN, G.P.O. COMPLEX, BLOCK A, INA, NEW SATARKTA BHAWAN, G.P.O. COMPLEX, BLOCK A, INA SATARKTA BHAWAN, G.P.O. COMPLEX, BLOCK A, INA DELHI-110023. DR N T R UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, REP. BY ITS 3. DR N T R UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, REP. BY ITS DR N T R UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R. DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH- REGISTRAR VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R. DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH REGISTRAR VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R. DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 520008.
THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, DR. N.T.R. UNIVERSITY OF THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, DR. N.T.R. UNIVERSITY OF 4. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, DR. N.T.R. UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. HEALTH SCIENCES, NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. HEALTH SCIENCES, NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. E PRINCIPAL, GUNTUR MEDICAL COLLEGE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR 5. THE PRINCIPAL, GUNTUR MEDICAL COLLEGE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR E PRINCIPAL, GUNTUR MEDICAL COLLEGE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ Order or direction particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent no.4 in issuing the impugned letter in Ref. NO.1102/EIC/MBBS/2025, dated 25.08.2025 in rejecting the representation of the petitioner dated 13.08.2025 seeking an extra attempt in addition to four attempts to appear in the MBBS I year supplementary examinations scheduled from 16.09.2025 with a grant of additional compensatory time of 30 minutes in view of the benchmark disability as a reasonable accommodation in terms of Section 2(y) of the Right of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, as against the Guidelines issued regarding admission of students with Specified Disabilities under the right of persons with disability Act 2016, with respect to admission in MBBS course and the said action of the authorities is illegal, unjust, unfair, arbitrary and being in violation of the Fundamental Rights of the petitioner guaranteed under Article 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India besides being in violation of the Judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Vikash Kumar Vs.
Union Public Service Commission and Ors, MANU/SC/0067/2021 and consequently set aside the impugned letter in Ref. No.1102/EIC/MBBS/2025, dated 25.08.2025 respondents to provide an extra attempt to appear in the MBBS I year supplementary examinations scheduled from 16.09.2025 with a grant of additional compensatory time of 30 minutes in view of the benchmark disability as a reasonable accommodation in terms of Section 2(y) of the Right of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 and to pass the respondent no.4 duly directing issued by IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned letter in Ref. No.1102/EIC/MBBS/2025, dated 25.08.2025 in terms of Section 2(y) of the Right of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 and the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Vikash Kumar Vs. and Ors, Union Public Service Commission MANU/SC/0067/2021dulygranting an extra attempt to appear in the MBBS I year supplementary examinations scheduled from 16.09.2025 with a grant of additional compensatory time of 30 minutes pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. JADA SRAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
Operative part
1. GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH FW 3 The Court made the following order: Sri S.Santhosh, learned counsel, representing Sri Jada Sravan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the Writ Petition. Permission, as sought for, is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any pending in the Writ Petition, shall stand closed. Date: 06.10.2025 MP _____________________________ JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY 4 42 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 24542 of 2025 Dated:06.10.2025 MP
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Disabilities Act, 2016; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 06 Oct 2025. The bench was K SREENIVASA REDDY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.