NEAR v. OFFICE, OPP. CHURCH CENTER, ONGOLE
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
the writ petition is disposed off directing the
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. In view of the same, for the reasons alike in the aforesaid order, this writ petition is also disposed of, in terms of the order, dated
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. SASANKA BHUVANAGIRI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP -3- HN, J W.P.No.22815_2025 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.22815 OF 2025
ORDER:
The present writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the action of the 2nd respondent in a giving markings to petitioners undivided Joint family property i.e., 17.6 Sq yards of land including a G + 1 RCC building bearing Door No.37-1-108, Assessment No.1035027751, T.S.No.511, Trunk Road, Ongole, Prakasam District, b) pressurizing the 1st petitioner to accept TDR certificates by handing over the said property to the 2nd respondent for proposed road widening of the Trunk Road from Church Centre to Keerthi Medical Shop to a width of 100 feet as per the Master Plan and c) initiating steps to demolish said property of the petitioners by dispossessing from the land without following the procedure under The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act 2013, as arbitrary and illegal.
Heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for Ongole Municipal Corporation.
Operative part
During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by the order dated 08.09.2025 passed by this Court in -4- HN, J W.P.No.22815_2025 W.P.No.21175 of 2025 and requested to pass a similar order in this writ petition also. The same is not disputed by the learned counsel appearing for the Respondents. The operative portion of the said order, reads as under: to disturb
….the writ petition is disposed off directing the respondent authorities not possession and enjoyment of the petitioner’s property without following due process of law, making respondent authorities shall have to follow the Act 30 of 13 while acquiring the land of the petitioner.
further clear
In view of the same, for the reasons alike in the aforesaid order, this writ petition is also disposed of, in terms of the order, dated
08.09.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.21175 of 2025. There shall be no order as to costs.
Registry is directed to annex a copy of the order in W.P. No.21175 of 2025 to the order in the present writ petition. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. Dt.24.09.2025 NKA ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N -5- HN, J W.P.No.22815_2025 369 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 22815 of 2025 Date: 24.09.2025 NKA
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: the writ petition is disposed off directing the
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151; Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 24 Sep 2025. The bench was HARINATH N.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.