VELPULA VENKATESWARLU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Recording the same, the writ petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Recording the same, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. Date 27.10.2025 KKV ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.26987…
Judgment
Yaddanapudi Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Bangaraiah, aged about 40 years, Rio. 5. Yaddanapudi Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Bangaraiah, aged about 40 years, Rio. 5. Yaddanapudi Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Bangaraiah, aged about 40 years, Rio. Thorragudipadu Village, Chimakurthi Mandal, Prakasam District, A.P. Thorragudipadu Village, Chimakurthi Mandal, Prakasam District, A.P. Thorragudipadu Village, Chimakurthi Mandal, Prakasam District, A.P. Yaddanapudi Bhaskar Rao, S/o. Bangaraiah, aged about' 38 years, R/o. 6. Yaddanapudi Bhaskar Rao, S/o. Bangaraiah, aged about' 38 years, R/o. Yaddanapudi Bhaskar Rao, S/o. Bangaraiah, aged about' 38 years, R/o. Thorragudipadu Village, Chimakurthi Mandal, Prakasam District, A.P. Thorragudipadu Village, Chimakurthi Mandal, Prakasam District, A.P. Thorragudipadu Village, Chimakurthi Mandal, Prakasam District, A.P. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to to issue any writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents No.
3 and 4 not to call the Petitioner to the Ongole Rural and Chimakurthi Police Stations and not to put troubles to the Petitioner and not to file false cases against the Petitioner and his family members and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to pass an interim order directing the Respondents No. 3 and 4 not to call the Petitioner to the Ongole Rural Police and Chimakurthi Station on the support of the unofficial respondents by way of an interim measure until disposal of the above writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: SRINIVASA RAO NARRA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents:NAGA PRAVEEN VANKAYALAPATI The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26897 OF 2021 The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
…to issue any writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents No. 3 and 4 not to call the Petitioner to the Ongole Rural and Chimakurthi Police Stations and not to put troubles to the Petitioner and not to file false cases against the Petitioner and his family members and pass…
Heard Sri Narra Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that basing on the complaint from unofficial respondent(s) through Spandana, they have called the petitioner to the police station for enquiry, but no crime has been registered against the petitioner.
Operative part
Recording the same, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. Date 27.10.2025 KKV ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.26987 of 2021 Dt.27.10.2025 329 KKV
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the same, the writ petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 27 Oct 2025. The bench was VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.