Thota Gopalu v. And The State of Andhra Pradesh and f Andhra Pradesh and 6
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no orders as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE B.S. BHANUMATHI Dated 23.07.2025 GRL BSB,J W.P.No.18585 of 2016…
Judgment
Counsel for the respondent espondents:
Government Pleader for Forests overnment Pleader for Forests (A.P.)
Government Pleader for Assignment (A. overnment Pleader for Assignment (A.P.) overnment for Revenue (A.P.) 3. Government for Revenue (A.P.) The Court made the following made the following order: The writ petition is filed is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India under Article 226 of Constitution of India to an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature andamus declaring the action of the respondents No. of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No .3 and 4 in seeking to take possession of the lands in an extent of Ac.4 00 cents in Sy seeking to take possession of the lands in an extent of Ac 4 00 cents in Sy. No.389/1; Ac.3.00 cents in Sy 00 cents in Sy.No.389-2; Ac.0.97 cents in Sy cents in Sy.No.389-3; Ac.1.97 cents in Sy.No.389 389-4 and Act. 2.96 cents in Sy.No.370 370-3; Ac.1.00 cents in Sy.No.371-1; Ac.2
2.92 cents in Sy.No.376-1 and Ac.2.73 cents in Sy 73 cents in Sy. No.371-2; Ac.1.27 cents in Sy 27 cents in Sy.No.3721 of Atlur village and mandal andal, Y.S.R district belongs to the petitioners saying that the same ha been handed over istrict belongs to the petitioners saying that the same had been handed over illegal and violative of the to them by the respondents No.5 to 7 as arbitrary, illegal and violative of the to them by the respondents No BSB,J W.P.No.18585 of 2016 2 fundamental and constitutional rights guaranteed to the petitioners under Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents No.3 and 4 not to interfere with the rights of the petitioners over the land in an extent of Ac.4.00 cents in Sy.No.389/1; Ac.3.00 cents in Sy.No.389-2; Ac.0.97 cents in Sy.No.389-3; Ac.I.97 cents in Sy.No 389-4 and Ac.2.96 cents in Sy.No.370-3; Ac. 1.00 cents in Sy.No.371-1 & Ac.
2.92 cents in Sy.No.376-1 and Ac.2.73 cents in Sy.No.371-2 & Ac.1.27 cents in Sy No 372-1 of Atlur village and mandal, Y.S.R district without following due process of law and pass such order or orders which this Court deems fit in the interest of justice.
2. Sri Dorababu, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the relief had become infructuous.
Operative part
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no orders as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE B.S. BHANUMATHI Dated 23.07.2025 GRL BSB,J W.P.No.18585 of 2016 3 188 THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI W.P. No.18585 of 2016 Date: 23.07.2025 GRL
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 23 Jul 2025. The bench was B S BHANUMATHI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.