KARUMURI KOTAIAH v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Judgment
MONDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 22243/2023 Between:
1. KARUMURI KOTAIAH,, S/O. MOSHE, AGED 47 YEARS, VRO, R/O R/O D.NO. 15-62 B, CHERUVULOPALEM, CHEBROLU VILLAGE . AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR.
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, BAPATLA DISTRICT
THASILDAR, TSUNDURU(M), BAPATLA DISTRICT.
DEPUTY THASILDAR, TSUNDURU(M), BAPATLA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the action of the respondents is illegal, for issuing transfer 2 order Rc.no.3247/2021-A2, dated 14-09-2021 without proper enquiry and for not considering the petitioner's name in the list (D.O. Letter No. Ser IV(2)/160/2021, CCLA, A.P., 86 Spl. CS to Govt., dated 10.03.2022, as detailed in Rc. No. 370/2020-A2), consequently direct the respondents to consider the petitioner and transfer to his home village, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the transfer order Rc.no.3247/2021-A2, dated 14-09-2021 issued by the 2nd respondent pending disposal of the Writ Petition and IA NO: 2 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents representations submitted by the petitioner forthwith pending disposal of the Writ Petition and to direct the respondents for the immediate transfer of the petitioner back to his home village, and pass the objections/ to consider Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. Dr SAYYED BABU SHAIK Counsel for the Respondent(S):
Operative part
1. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY W.P.No.22243 of 2023 O R DE R: Learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition stating that he will pursue his remedies according to law. Permission as sought for is accorded. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue his legal remedies as and when occasion arises. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions if any shall stand dismissed. ___________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 21.07.2025 KLP
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 21 Jul 2025. The bench was NYAPATHY VIJAY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.