G Padma v. State Of Andhra Pradesh Represented & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Judgment
G Padma, W/o G Venkataratnam Aged 63 Years, House wife Padma salipeta Srikalahasthi, Chittoor District R/o 10-274, AND ...PETITIONER
State Pradesh Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur Dt., Andhra Pradesh. Represented, Home Secretary Andhra A.P
The Director General of Prisons and correctional Institutions, For the State of Andhra Pradesh, at D No 24-28/1-8A Durgapuram, Gulabithota, Vijayawada-520003, Andhra Pradesh.
The Superintendent, Central Prison, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in ...RESPONDENTS the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to pass a writ, order or direction more particularly in the name of writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of Constitution of India, declaring the action of the respondents in not releasing the Petitioners son a life convict his repeated Applications and not on Parole/Furlough by rejecting considering even for once despite of the fact that he completed more than 11 years 6 months of actual imprisonment without any jail offence and with illegal and unlawful good prison conduct is moreover unconstitutional of the Constitution of India and against the violating Article 14 and 21 - Andhra Pradesh Prison Rules and the very concept of Respondent Prisons and Correctional Services Consequently direct the Respondents to take immediate steps to release my Son Gopisetty Rajesh S/o G Venkataratnam (CT No 2723 ) Aged 34 years from Respondent No 3 Central Prison, by granting Parole or Furlough under the Rules of Andhra Pradesh Manual.
Nellore Prison lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents particularly Respondent No2 immediately to grant regular Parole or Furlough for my Son Gopisetty Rajesh S/o G Venkataratnam (CT No 2723 ) Aged 34 years from Respondent No 3 Central. Prison, Nellore by considering and reviewing the 4th time Appication through No Letter 14.03.2020 asper Lr No SI 4/Rc.242/81 dated 08-07-1981 O/o. the 2nd respondent on rejection of three consequitive earlier Applications from 2018 onwards by concerned District Superintendent of Police, pending disposal of the above writ petition. CPN/JR (W)/1483/2020 Respondent Dated 3rd Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D SURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010387632021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3457] (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 23797/2021 Between: G Padma PETITIONER ■ ■ ■ AND State Of Andhra Pradesh Represented and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.DSURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER:- 2 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition.
Operative part
3. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be nd) order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// Sd/- G.HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Nfy SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to Sri D Suresh Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra 3. Three CD Copies Pradesh. [OUT] TF HIGH COURT DATED:18/06/2025 ORDER WP.No.23797 of 2021 DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 18 Jun 2025. The bench was HARINATH N.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.