VA TECH WABAG LIMITED,, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER v. HAVING ITS PROJECT SITE OFFICE AT RASHTRIYA ISPAT NIGAM
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as non-prosecution
Provisions considered
- Companies Act, 2013
- Constitution of India arts. 14, 226
- Cess Act, 1996
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the Respondent No.4 not to remit the amounts so deducted towards 1% Cess under the Cess Act from the bills of the Petitioner to the credit of Respondents 1 to 3 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P VENKATA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR LABOUR (AP)
2. V SUBRAHMANYAM 3 JS,J W.P.No.13487/2017 The Court made the following
ORDER:
Operative part
Though the matter was adjourned on 08.10.2025 and 15.10.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Today when the matter is called there is no representation for the petitioner. It appears that the learned counsel for the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the case. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Dated: 12.11.2025 KAS __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 4 JS,J W.P.No.13487/2017 256 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 13847/2017 Dated: 12.11.2025 KAS
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as non-prosecution
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Companies Act, 2013; Constitution of India — arts. 14, 226; Cess Act, 1996; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 12 Nov 2025. The bench was SUMATHI JAGADAM.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.