G. Venkateswararao v. Dept., Secretariat, Amaravati, Guntur District
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty as
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty as prayed for. No costs. As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SDI- N I^AGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR I SECTION OFFICER To,
Judgment
of India praying that in the the High Court n|iay be or direction more particuiariy one in the nature of 4*^ Respondent ty; ng a period of 3 years i.e. an extent of Ac, 5-20 cents out of Ac. 25-20 cents in S.No. arbitrary Guntur District as illegal, and, violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 4» respondent not to interfere for the 3'^ year lease period 2025-26. LA NO: 1 OF 207.*; 4^ Petition under Section 151 CPC in the affidavit filed i direct rinhr' ‘"^i rights of 4 2023 to 2026 to praying that in the circumstances stated in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to leasehold subsisting for a period of 3 years i.e. respondent temple land an extent of Ac. 5-20 cents out of Ac. 25-20 cents in S.No. 270 of Kurnuthala. Vatticherukuru the writ petition. Mandal, Guntur District pending disposal Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI THOTA RAMAKOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3:GP FOR ENDOWMENTS Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI KAPPERA KOTESWARA RAO SC The Court made the following order: FOR ENDOWMENTS APHC010357832025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 18282 OF 2025 Between: G. Venkateswararao AND ...Petitioner The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Thota Ramakoteswara Rao Counsel for the Respondents: Kappera Koteswara Rao GP for Endowments The Court made the following order: Sri Thota Ramakoteswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to avail the remedies available under law.
#3. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty as prayed for. No costs. As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SDI- N I^AGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR I SECTION OFFICER To,
#4. One CC to Sri Thota Ramakoteswara Rao, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri Kappera Koteswara Rao, SC for Endowments [OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Endowments, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] Two CD Copies. HIGH COURT DATED:04/08/2025 mjr-* ORDER WP No.18282 OF 2025 5 ? 13 AUG 2025 a ^ . Current Section , ^ CoL dismissing the w.p. as withdrawn WITHOUT COSTS
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 04 Aug 2025. The bench was KIRANMAYEE, KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.