Ecoren Energy India Private Ltd, having its registered office at v. Union of India

65/A, Srinivasapuram, Tiruchanoor Road, Tirupati, represented by its Chairman AND Managing Director and Chief General Manager

3. Central Electricity Authority, Sewa Bhawan, R.K.Puram, Sector - 1, New Delhi - 110006 Rep by its Chairperson

4. Reserve Bank of India, Dept, of Banking Regulation, Central Office, 12th Floor, Shahid Bhagat Singh Marg Fort, Mumbai - 400001

6. Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency. India Habitat Centre, East Court, Core - 4A, 1 st Floor, Lodhi Road. New Delhi -110 03 India Infrastructure Finance Company Ltd. 5th Floor, Block - 2, Plate A AND B, NBCC Tower, East Kidwai Nagar, New Delhi - 110023

7. Tata Cleantech Capital Ltd TCCL, 1-Think Techno Campus, A wing, 4th Floor. Off Pokhran Road No. 2, Thane West, Mumbai - 400607

8. M/s PTC India Financial Services Ltd, 7th Floor, Telephone Exchange Building, Telephone Exchange Building, 8 Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi - 110 066

9. Reliance Capital Limited, Reliance Centre, 6th Floor, South Wing, Off Western Express Highway, Santacruz (East), Mumbai - 400 055 ...Respondents lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dated 02.07.2025 passed by the stay the operation of the Common Order I.A. No. 1, 2, & 3 of 2024 and Learned Single Judge of this Hon'ble Court in lA. No. 1 of 2020 in W.P.No.21601 of 2019. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P SRI RAGHU RAM SR. COUNSEL AND SRI SHOEB ALAM SR COUNSEL APPEARING VICE SRI SHAGUFTA JAHAN NOOR Counsel for the Respondents: SRI VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL Counsel for the Respondents: SRI JUPUDI V K YAGNADUTT(CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL) Counsel for the Respondents: SRI SAI SANJAY SURANENI Counsel for the Respondents: SRI P RAJASEKHAR Counsel for the Respondents: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondents: SRI SHAIK MOHAMMED ISMAIL APHC010343522025 WRIT APPEAL NO: 793 OF 2025 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters against the Common Order of 2020 in dated 02-07-2025 in IA.No.1,2, and 3 of 2024 and lA No.1 W.P.No.21601 of 2019 on the file of the High Court. Between: Danu Wind Parks Private Limited, having its registered office at Plot No. 1202,1215A, Door No. 8-2-293/82/A/I202, S.L. Jubilee, Road No.61, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500033 Represented by its Authorized Representative Suresh Babu Gudikandula AND ...Petitioner

1. Ecoren Energy India Private Limited, having its registered office at Plot No. 1202,1215A,DoorNo. 8-2-293/82/A/I202, S.L. Jubilee, Road No.61, Represented by its Authorized Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500033 Representative Suresh Babu Gudikandula.

2. Aeolus Wind Parks Private Limited, having its registered office at Plot No. 1202,1215A,DoorNo. 8-2-293/82/A/I202, S.L. Jubilee, Road No.61, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500033 Represented by its Authorized Representative Suresh Babu Gudikandula

3. Fujin Wind Parks Private Limited, having its registered office at Plot No. 1202,1215A, Door No. 8-2-293/82/A/I202, S.L. Jubilee, RoadNo.61, Represented by its Authorized Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500033 Representative Suresh Babu Gudikandula

4. Dindore Winds Private Limited, having its registered office at Plot No. 1202,1215A,DoorNo. 8-2-293/82/A/I 202, S.L. Jubilee, RoadNo.61, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500033 Representative Suresh Babu Gudikandula Represented by its Authorized

5. Ananthapur Energy Projects Private Limited, having its registered office Vi] ayawada, 520010 Babu Suresh Prajasaktinagar Lakshmi Nilayam, 32-5-3, Represented Representative Authorized Gudikandula

6. Boreas at Plot No. 1202 Renewable Energy Private Limited, having its registered office 1215A,DoorNo. 8-2-293/82/A/I202, S.L. Jubilee, Road Represented by its Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500033 No.61 Authorized Representative Suresh Babu Gudikandula

7. Jwalya Wind 63/493, Motilal Nagar - 111 Private Limited, having its registered office at M. G. Road, Goregaon (West), 400090 Represented by its Authorized Representative H. NO. Mumbai- Suresh Babu Gudikandula

8. Union of India, Represented by its Secretary, Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, Block-14, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi - 110003

9. Southern Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh Ltd, 19-13- represented by its Tiruchanoor Road, Timpati, and Managing Director and Chief General Manager 65/A, Srinivasapuram Chairman

10. Central Electricity Authority, Sewa Bhawan, R.K.Puram, Sector- 1, New Delhi - 110006 Rep by its Chairperson

11. Reserve Bank of India, Dept, of Banking Regulation, Central Office, 12th Floor,

12. Indian Shahid Bhagat Singh Marg Fort, Mumbai - 400001 Renewable Energy Development Agency, India Habitat 4A 1st Floor, Lodhi Road, New Delhi - 110 Centre, East Court, Core - 03

13. India Infrastructure Finance Company Ltd, 5th Floor, Block - 2, Plate A and B, NBCC Tower, East Kidwai Nagar, New Delhi - 110023

14. Tata Cleantech Capital Off Pokhran Road No. 2, Ltd TCCL, 1-Think Techno Campus, A Mumbai - Thane West, wing, 4th Floor, 400607

15. M/s PTC India Financial Services Ltd, 7th Floor, Telephone Exchange Building, 8 Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi - 110 066 Capital Limited, Reliance Centre, 6th Floor, Reliance

16. South Wing, Off. Western Express Highway, Santacruz (East), Mumbai - 400 055 lA NO: 2 OF 2025 ...Respondents Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dated 02.07.2025 passed by the Order stay the operation of the Common LA. No. 1,2, & 3 of 2024 and Learned Single Judge of this Hon'ble Court in lA. No. 1 of 2020 in W.P.No.21601 of 2019. Petitioner: SRI B.ABHAY SIDDHANTH MOOTHA Counsel for the Counsel for the Respondents; SRI VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL Counsel for the Respondents: SRI JUPUDI V K YAGNADUTT(CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL) Counsel for the Respondents: SRI SAI SANJAY SURANENI Counsel for the Respondents: SRI P RAJASEKHAR Counsel for the Respondents: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondents: SRI SHAIK MOHAMMED ISMAIL APHC010343672025 0^0 WRIT APPEAL NO: 794 OF 2025 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Common order dated 02-07-2025 in lA No. 1, 2 and 3 of 2024 and lA No. 1 of 2020 in WP.No. 21601 of 2019 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. Ecoren Energy India Private Limited, having its registered office at Plot No. 1202,1215A. Door No. 8-2-293/82/A/I 202, RoadNo.61, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500033 S.L. Jubilee, Represented by its Authorized Representative Suresh Babu Gudikandula.

2. Danu Wind Parks Private Limited, having its registered office at Plot No. 1202,1215A,DoorNo. 8-2-293/82/A/I202, S.L. Jubilee, RoadNo.61, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500033 Represented by its Authorized Representative Suresh Babu Gudikandula

3. Aeolus Wind Parks Private Limited, having its registered office at Plot No. 1202,1215A,DoorNo. 8-2-293/82/A/I202, S.L. Jubilee, RoadNo.61, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500033 Represented by its Authorized Representative Suresh Babu Gudikandula

4. Fujin Wind Parks Private Limited, having its registered office at Plot No. 1202,1215A,DoorNo. 8-2-293/82/A/1202, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500d33 Representative Suresh Babu Gudikandula S.L. Jubilee, RoadNo.61, Represented by its Authorized

5. Dindore Winds Private Limited, having its registered office at Plot No. 1202,1215A,Door No. 8-2-293/82/A/I202, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500033 Representative Suresh Babu Gudikandula S.L. Jubilee, RoadNo.61, Represented by its Authorized

6. Ananthapur Energy Projects Private Limited, having its registered office Vijayawada, 520010 Prajasaktinagar Represented 32-5-3, Lakshmi Nilayam, Authorized Representative Suresh Babu Gudikandula

7. Boreas Renewable Energy Private Limited, having its registered office Plot No. 1202,1215A, Door No. 8-2-293/82/A/I202, S.L. Jubilee, RoadNo.61, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500033 Represented by its Authorized Representative Suresh Babu Gudikandula

8. Jwalya Wind Private Limited, having its registered office at H. NO. 63/493, Motilal Nagar - 400090 Represented by its Authorized Representative Suresh Babu M. G. Road, Goregaon (West), Mumbai- III, Gudikandula AND ...Petitioners

1. Ministry of New and Union of India, Represented by its Secretary, Renewable Energy, Block-14, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi - 110003

2. Southern Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh Ltd, 19-13- represented by its 65/A, Srinivasapuram, Tiruchanoor Road, Tirupati, Chairman and Managing Director and Chief General Manager Central Electricity Authority, Sewa Bhawan, R.K.Puram, New Delhi - 110006 Rep by its Chairperson Sector -

3. 1,

4. Reserve Bank of India, Dept, of Banking Regulation, Central Office,

7. 12th Floor, Shahid Bhagat Singh Marg Fort, Mumbai - 400001 Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency, India Habitat Centre, East Court, Core - 4A, 1st Floor, Lodhi Road, New Delhi -110 03 India Infrastructure Finance Company Ltd, 5th Floor, Block - 2, and B, NBCC Tower, East Kidwai Nagar, New Delhi - 110023 Tata Cleantech Capital Ltd TCCL, 1-Think Techno Campus, A wing, 4th Floor, Off Pokhran Road No. 2, Thane West, Mumbai - 400607 Plate A

8. M/s PTC India Financial Services Ltd, 7th Floor, Telephone Exchange Building, 8 Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi - 110 066

9. Reliance Capital Limited, Reliance Centre, 6th Floor, South Wing, Off. Western Express Highway, Santacruz (East), Mumbai - 400 055 ...Respondents lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of the Common Order dated 02.07.2025 passed by the Learned Single Judge of this Hon'ble Court in I.A. No. 1,2, & 3 of 2024 and lA. No. 1 of 2020 in W.P.No.21601 of 2019. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI SHAGUFTA JAHAN NOOR Counsel for the Respondents: SRI VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL Counsel for the Respondents: SRI SAI SANJAY SURANENI Counsel for the Respondents:SRI P RAJASEKHAR Counsel for the Respondents: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondents: SRI SHAIK MOHAMMED ISMAIL APHC010343652025 WRIT APPEAL NO: 795 OF 2025 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Common Order dated 02-07-2025 in lA.No. 1,2, and 3 of 2024 and lA No. 1 of 2020 in WP No. 21601 of 2019 on the file of the High Court. Between: Danu Wind Parks Private Limited, having its registered office at Plot No. 1202,1215A,DoorNo. 8-2-293/82/A/I202, S.L. Jubilee, Road No.61, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500033 Represented by its Authorized Representative Suresh Babu Gudikandula-^ ' AND ...Petitioner

1. Ecoren Energy India Private Limited, having its registered office at Plot S.L. Jubilee, Road Represented by its 1202,1215A, Door No. 8-2-293/82/A/1202, Hills, Hyderabad - 500033 Jubilee No. No.61 Authorized Representative Necessary Party) Suresh Babu Gudikandula. (Not a

2. Aeolus Wind Parks Private Limited, having its registered office at Plot No. 1202,1215A,DoorNo. 8-2-293/82/A/1202, Hills, Hyderabad - 500033 No.61, Authorized Representative Suresh Babu Gudikandula Jubilee S.L. Jubilee, Road Represented by its

3. Fujin Wind Parks Private Limited, having its registered office at Plot No. S.L. Jubilee, Road No.61, Represented by its Authorized 1202,1215A, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500033 Representative Suresh Babu Gudikandula Door No. 8-2-293/82/A/I202,

4. Dindore Winds Private Limited, having its registered office at Door No. 8-2-293/82/A/I202, Plot No. 1202,1215A, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500033 Representative Suresh Babu Gudikandula S.L. Jubilee, Road No.61, Represented by its Authorized - 400 055

5. Ananthapur Energy Projects Private Limited, having its registered office Vijayawada, 520010 Babu Suresh Represented 32-5-3, Lakshmi Nilayam Representative Prajasaktinagar Authorized Gudikandula

6. Boreas Plot No. Renewable Energy Private Limited, having its registered office S.L. Jubilee, Represented by its 1202,1215A, Door No. 8-2-293/82/A/1202, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500033 Road No.61, Authorized Representative Suresh Babu Gudikandula

7. Jwalya Wind Private 63/493, Motilal Nagar - Limited, having its registered office at M. G. Road, Goregaon (West), 111, H. NO Mumbai- 400090 Represented by its Authorized Representative Suresh Babu Gudikandula (Not Necessary Parties)

8. Union of India, Represented by its Secretary, Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, Block-14, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi - 110003

9. Southern Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh Ltd, 19-13- represented by its 65/A, Srinivasapuram, Tiruchanoor Road, Tirupati, Chairman and Managing Director and Chief General Manager

11. Central Electricity Authority, Sewa Bhawan, R.K.Puram, Sector 1, New Delhi - 110006 Rep by its Chairperson Bank of India, Dept, of Banking Regulation, Reserve 12th Floor, Shahid Bhagat Singh Marg Fort, Mumbai - 400001 Central Office,

12. Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency. India Habitat Centre. East Court. Core - 4A, 1st Floor, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110 03

13. India Infrastructure Finance Company Ltd, 5th Floor, Block - 2, Plate A and B, NBCC Tower, East Kidwai Nagar, New Delhi - 110023

14. Tata 4th Floor, Off Pokhran Road No. 2, Thane West, Cleantech Capital Ltd TCCL, 1-Think Techno Campus. A Mumbai -

16. 400607 M/s PTC India Financial Services Ltd, 7th Floor, Telephone Exchange Building 8 Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi - 110 066 Capital Limited, Reliance Centre, 6th Floor Reliance Off Western Express Highway, Santacruz (East), Mumbai Wing, South lA NO: 2 OF 2025 ...Respondents Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dated 02.07.2025 passed by the I.A. No. 1, 2, & 3 of 2024 and of the Common Order stay the operation Learned Single Judge of this Hon'We Court in lA. No. 1 of 2020 in W.P.No.21601 of 2019 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B.ABHAY SIDDHANTH MOOTHA Counsel for the Respondents: SRI VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL Counsel for the Respondents: SRI JUPUDI V K YAGNADUTT(CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL) Counsel for the Respondents: SRI SAI SANJAY SURANENI Counsel for the Respondents: SRI P RAJASEKHAR Counsel for the Respondents: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondents: SRI SHAIK MOHAMMED ISMAIL The Court made the following Common order: Y, '4 . APHC010343552025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVAT! WRIT APPEAL NO; 792 of 2025 along with W.A.Nos.793, 794 & 795 of 2025 Bench Sr.Nos:- 15-18 [3483] W.A.No.792 of 2025: Ecoren Energy India Private Ltd and others Vs. Union of India and others ...Appellants ...Respondents Advocate for Appellants Mr. P. Sri Raghu Ram, Sr. Counsel & Mr. Shoeb Alam, Sr. Counsel appearing vice Ms. Shagufta Jahan Noor Advocates for Respondents Mr. O. Manohar Reddy, Sr. Counsel CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 11th July 2025 Per DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR. CJ: The present set of Writ Appeals, under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, preferred against a common judgment and order,

02.07.2025, rendered in I.A.Nos.1, 2 & 3 of 2024 and I.A.No.1 of 2020 in W.P.No.21601 of 2019, whereby the interim orders, dated 02.01.2020 and

22.11.2022 are vacated. C' 2 HCJ & RCJ W A No 792 of 2025 & batch

2. Briefly stated, the material facts are as under; The appellants herein are wind and solar power generators, who claim that they had entered into Power Purchase Agreements (in short, ‘PPA’) with the Power Distribution Companies at rates which also had statutory approval of the Regulatory Authority i.e. the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (APERC).

3. According to the Power Purchase Agreements entered into between the parties, the appellants had claimed that they were entitled to be paid the charges as per the agreed rates prescribed for solar power and wind power separately. The appellants claim that on account of the change of the Government in 2019, there was a change in policy and perception and an effort was made by the Government through the Power Distribution Companies, which are controlled only by the Government, to deny to the appellants the rates which are otherwise fixed as per the Power Purchase Agreements.

4. In the earlier round of litigation, it is stated that a Writ Petition was filed in which, as an interim measure, a learned single Judge of this Court ordered to pay an amount of Rs.2.44/- per unit of solar power generated and Rs.2.43/- per unit of wind power generated till such time as O.P.No.17 of 2019 filed by the Power Distribution Companies before the Regulatory Commission was decided. r HCJ & RCJ W A.No 792 of 2025 & batch

5. It is stated that a batch of Writ Appeals came to be preferred challenging this direction passed by the learned single Judge, which ultimately set aside and the DISCOMs were directed to pay the appellants the same rates as were contained in the Power Purchase Agreements for the power so generated by them.

6. The Division Bench also held that the O.P.No.17 of 2019 preferred by the DISCOMs before the Regulatory Commission was not maintainable as it was not open to the Regulatory Commission to amend the parameters and reduce the tariff, which was to be made operative for a period of 25 years by separate tariff orders, as the same was not subject to periodic review.

7. In the interregnum between the date when the order, dated

29.04.2019, came to be passed by the learned single Judge, subsequently became the subject matter of Writ Appeals as discussed hereinabove and the decision rendered in the batch of Writ Appeals by virtue of judgment and order, dated 15.03.2022, the appellants herein preferred W.P.No.21601 of 2019.

8. The relief that was prayed for in the aforementioned Writ Petition was in the nature of Mandamus to the Power Distribution Company to make payments of the outstanding amounts in respect of the respective Power Purchase Agreements along with late payments of surcharge at an interim r 4 HCJ & RCJ W A No.792 of 2025 & batch Rs.2.43/- per unit. A further relief was sought to restrain the' tenders/respondent Nos.6 to 8 in the writ petition i.e. India Infrastructure Finance Company Ltd., Tata Cleantech Capital Ltd., and M/s. PTC India Financial Services Ltd. from taking any precipitative steps against the petitioners in respect of loan facilities extended to them and further that the statutory period of 90 days for declaring the account as Non Performing Asset (NPA) as per RBI Master Circular, dated 01.07.2015, and RBI Circular, dated

07.06.2019, should commence after the O.P.No.17 of 2019 was finally disposed of.

9. By virtue of the interim orders, dated 02.01.2020 and 22.11.2022 W.P.No.21601 of 2019, the learned single Judge passed the following orders: Order, dated 02.01.2020: In the meantime, considering that, in the order dated 24-09-2019 this Court observed that the in W.P.No.9844 of 2019 and batch, petitioners have invested money and have also borrowed money for establishing the project, where the return of investment, the tariff etc., is the basis for financial assistance rendered by the institutions, there shall be stay of proceedings of declaration of NPA in respect of the petitioners. ” Order, dated 22.11.2022: In view of the above circumstances, there shall be an interim direction directing the respondents not to take any coercive action against the petitioners till 02.12.2022. ” 5 HCJ & RCJ W.A.No.792 of 2025 & batch

10. Interlocutory Applications vide I.A.Nos.1, 2 & 3 of 2024 and i.A.No.1 of 2020 came to be filed by the respondents/lenders seeking vacation of the interim orders, dated 02.01.2020 and 22.11.2022, which applications are ordered by virtue of the judgment and order, dated 02.07.2025, which is impugned in the present set of writ appeals.

11. Mr. P. Sri Raghu Ram, learned Senior Counsel & Mr. Shoeb Alam, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellants, would submit that it was true that huge sums of money had been advanced by the private respondents, based upon the feasibility of the projects of the appellants in reference to the Power Purchase Agreements executed between the parties, yet if the lenders were permitted to recover the dues which the appellants owe to them on account of loans advanced, it would result in the closure of the entire power generation units set up by the appellants.

12. It was also stated that if an interim order was permitted to continue for a period of as many as five years, it should have been permitted to continue further till the matter was finally heard and decided by the learned single Judge.

13. We have heard learned counsel for the parties.

14. Learned counsel for the appellants lay a lot of emphasis on the need to sustain the power generating units, which would suffer irreparably in the lenders were permitted to recover their dues and that if they were HCJ & RCJ WA No 792 of 2025 & batch permitted to recover the dues, it would also directly affect the availability of power, which is otherwise required for the industrial growth of the country.

15. We find it difficult to accept the argument of learned counsel for the appellants that the lenders be restrained from recovering their outstanding dues till such time as the entire payment is received by them from the power distribution companies. In fact, the stand of the power distribution company is that the amounts strictly as per the Power Purchase Agreements were being paid to the appellants.

16. However, the right which is vested with the lenders to declare an account as an NPA is a statutory right to recover the outstanding dues and cannot be made subject to a further recovery from a third party like the power distribution company, which is not a signatory to the loan agreements entered into between the appellants and the lenders.

17. In any case, learned counsel for the appellants has failed to satisfy us as to how, in view of the specific loan agreements executed between them and the lenders, lenders could be restrained from proceeding further to recover the amounts outstanding after declaring the accounts of the appellants as NPA and that too the same is in accordance with the RBI Master Circular, dated 01.07.2015, and RBI Circular

07.06.2019.

18. Be that as it may, we do not find any merit in the present Writ Appeals, which are, accordingly, dismissed. No costs. HCJ & RCJ W A No 792 of2025 &ba!ch Consequently, connected miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. To //TRUE COPY// Sd./- V.DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER

1. One CC to 2. One CC to 3. One CC to 4. One CC to [OPUC] Sri. Shagufta Jahan Noor Advocate [OPUC] Sri. B.Abhay Siddhanth Mootha Advocate [OPUC] Sri. Venkata Rama Rao Kota SC for APSPDCL[OPUC Sri. Jupudi V K Yagnadutt(Cemral Government Counsel) ^ Sri. Sai Sanjay Suraneni Advocate [OPUCf Sri. P Rajasekhar Advocate [OPUC]

5. One CC to 6. One CC to 7. One CC to Sri.O Manohar Reddy Advocate [OPUC] 8. One CC to 9. One CC to Sri. Shireen Sethna Baria Advocate [OPUC] Sri. Shaik Mohammed Ismail Advocate [OPUC]

10. Two CD Copies GSC HIGH COURT DATED:11/07/2025 COMMON ORDER WA NOS. 792, 793, 794 AND 795 OF 2025 DISMISSING THE WAS WITHOUT COSTS