GADAMSETTY VEERANJANEYULU v. POKURU RAMAIAH
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 397, 401
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed for non- prosecution. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Criminal Revision Case, shall stand closed. Dated: 25.7.2025 TJN ____________________________ JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO 185 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 704…
Judgment
Cause title
Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances the affidavit CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto allow the revision support of stated case by setting aside the judgment dated 7.03.2015 made in CFR.2887/2011 IN RCS 33/2011 IN Cr.No.93/2010,on the file of Judicial Mgistrate I Clas, Kanigiri and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2015(CRLRCMP 1170 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 07.03.2015 made in CFR.2887/2011in RCS 33/2011in Cr.No.93/2010,on the file of Judicial Mgistrate I Clas, Kanigiri pending disposal of Crl.R.C., and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SANJEEV GILLELA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. CHENCHU RAMAIAH
2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following:
ORDER:-
This Criminal Revision Case under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C., is filed aggrieved by the order dated 07.03.2015 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kanigiri, in C.F.R.No.2887/2011.
Heard. Perused the entire material on record.
A perusal of the orders passed in C.F.R.No.2887 of 2011 goes to show that protest petition filed by the de-facto complainant is dismissed. In the said petition, learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kanigiri, framed question for consideration as to ‘whether the C.F.R. is cognizable and can be registered as a Calendar Case’?. After considering the material placed on record, learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kanigiri, dismissed the petition.
Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that according to his instructions, the revision petitioner is no more. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor also placed the copy of report enclosing death certificate of the de-facto complainant submitted by the Sub- Inspector of Police.
Considering the report submitted and on account of the death of the de- facto complainant/petitioner, this Court feels that the cause does not survive. Nonetheless, as per the death certificate, the de-facto complainant died on 20.3.2019 and no steps have been taken by the legal representatives. It appears that they also have no interest to prosecute the matter.
Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed for non- prosecution. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Criminal Revision Case, shall stand closed. Dated: 25.7.2025 TJN ____________________________ JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO 185 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 704 OF 2015 Dated: 25.7.2025 TJN
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — ss. 397, 401; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 25 Jul 2025. The bench was T MALLIKARJUNA RAO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.