T.V.SAI KUMAR v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 10 Aug 2026
- Bench
- B KRISHNA MOHAN
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, both the writ petitions are disposed of
Provisions considered
Judgment
SRI. JASTI VIJAYA SHANKAR,, AGED 68 YEARS, S/O. LATE SRI KRISHNAJIRAO, HINDU, PLOT NO.56, OCEAN DRIVE LAYOUT, NEAR SAGAR NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM-530045
SRI S. LAKSHMI PRASAD,, AGED 71 YEARS, S/O.SURAPANENI DORASWAMI, 7-22-21/4, PLOT NO.36, FLAT NO.201, SILVER LEAF APARTMENTS, 2 NDCROSS ROAD, BEHIND YMCA, KIRLAMPUDI LAYOUT, LB COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM 530017.
M/S.GCON PROPERTIES LLP,, OFFICE AT FLAT NO.201, SARADA TOWERS, FACOR LAYOUT, RAMNAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM, REPRESENTED SRI GOTTUMUKKALA SIVARAM TEJA, S/O. SRI GS RAJU, HINDU, AGED 21 YEARS, D.NO.54-13-6/7, FLAT NO.203, WHITE HOUSE, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM 530013 DESIGNATED PARTNER ITS BY
SMT.NADIMPALLI VENKATA RAJA RAJESWARI,, AGED 49 YEARS, W/O.SRI GOUTHAM, R/O.1-5, RAJULA VEEDHI, KODURUPADU, ALLAVARAM MANDAL, PERURU, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 53218
SMT.KALLEPALLI PADMA,, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, W/O.SRI 2 KALLEPALLI SUBBARAJU, R/O. 50-117-17/9/2/1, HILL VIEW LAYOUT, SEETHAMMADHARA NORTH EXTENSION, VISAKHAPATNAM 530013.
SRI KALLEPALLI SHANKAR ANANDA GIRIDHAR RAJU,, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O.SRI KALLEPALLI SUBBARAJU, R/O. 50-117/17/9/2/1, HILL VIEW LAYOUT, OPPOSITE ASR PARK, SEETHAMMADHARA NE, VISAKHAPATNAM 530013
SRI KANKIPATI SRIHARI RAJU,, AGED 74 YEARS, S/O.SRI KANKIPATI VENKATA SURYANARAYANA RAJU, R/O.47-7-15/12, DWARAKANAGAR 4TH LANE, VISAKHAPATNAM 530016
SRI NADIMPALLI GOUTHAM,, AGED 56 YEARS, S/O.SRI NADIMPALLI SUBBARAJU, 1-5, RAJULA VEEDHI, KODURUPADU, ALLAVARAM MANDAL,PERURU,EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 53218 R/O.
SMT.DANGATI RAMA TULASAMMA,, AGED 73 YEARS, W/O.DANGATI RIO. 50-112-43, PLOT.NO.407, LATE SRI SATYANARAYANA, CRESCENT TOWERS, TPT COLONY, OPPOSITE EENADU, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM 530013
SRI KONERU RAMAKRISHNA RAO,, AGED 89 YEARS, S/O.KONERU NAGABHUSANAM, R/O. 35 DASPALLA HILLS, NEAR WALTAIR CLUB, VISAKHAPATNAM 530003
SRI KATRAGADDA VENKATESWARULU,, AGED 86 YEARS, R/O. 7-20-3, KIRLAMPUDI S/O.KATRAGADDA RAGHAVAYYA, LAYOUT, OPPOSITE AU INTERNATIONAL HOSTEL, CHINNA WALTAIR, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530017.
SMT.LNDIRA DEVI,, AGED 78 YEARS, W/O.RAVI MURALI MOHAN, R/O.6-15-3/1, MADHURAVEEDHI, NEAR SHIRDI SAI BABA TEMPLE, EAST POINT COLONY, 530017. CHINNA WALTAIR, VISAKHAPATNAM
SMT.NANDIGAM SARASWATHI,, AGED 72 YEARS, W/O.NANDIGAM VENKAT NARAYANA DURGA PRASAD RAO, R/O. 10-3-15/1, WALTAIR UPLANDS, NEAR SAMPATH VINAYAKA TEMPLE, VISAKHAPATNAM 3
SRI DANDAMUDI RAMA KRISHNA PRASAD, AGED 60 YEARS, S/O.SATYANARYANA RAO, R/O. 5-170, CHINNA RUSHIKONDA, VISAKHAPATNAM 530045
SAI PRIYA RESORTS LIMTED, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI DANDAMUDI RAMA KRISHNA PRASAD, AGED 60 YEARS, R/O. 5-170. CHINNA S/O.SATYANARYANA RAO, RUSHIKONDA, VISAKHAPATNAM 530045
SMT.VALLURI RAJYA LAKSHMI,, AGED 45 YEARS, W/O.RAMESH VALLURI, R/O. 2-22/44/OR-42, ROAD NO.1, SHRIRAM PANORAMA HILLS. VISAKHAPATNAM 530045
SRI CHELIKANI VENKATA ATCHUT RAO,, AGED 57 YEARS, S/O.CHELIKANA VENKATA SITARAMA SWAMY, R/O. 10-27-13/A, WALTAIR UPLANDS, OPPOSITE WALTAIR CLUB, VISAKHAPATNAM 530003
SRI BANDI VEERA NATARAJ,, AGED 68 YEARS, S/O.BANDI BALA PRASADA RAO, THE PALMS H.NO.7-17-4/3, FLAT NO.3, APARTMENTS, 62 KIRLAMP LAYOUT, NEAR LALITHADEVI TEMPLE, VISAKHAPATNAM 530017
SMT.BANDI NAILINI,, AGED 59 YEARS, W/O.BANDI VEERA VENKATA NATARAJ, HINDU, H.NO.7-17-4/3, FLAT NO.3, THE PALMS APARTMENTS, 62 KIRLAMPUDI LAYOUT, NEAR LALITHADEVI TEMPLE, VISAKHAPATNAM 530017.
SMT.SINGU SARITHA, , AGED 49 YEARS, W/O.SINGU PRASANTH, DASPALLA LAYOUT, NEAR R/O. 2-138-1/4, PLOT NO.18-19, MUBHARAK COLONY, YENDADA, VISAKHAPATNAM 530045
SMT.NARRA SITAMAHALAKSHMI., AGED 71 YEARS. W/O.NARRA LOKANADHA RAO, R/O. 2-138-1/4, FLAT NO.18, DASPALLA LAYOUT, NEAR MUBHARAK COLONY, YENDADA, VISAKHAPATNAM 530045
SRI MRK PRASADA RAO, , AGED 62 YEARS, S/O.M.VENKATA RAO, H.NO.93, MUPPANA ALTO NAGALI, NEAR RAMESH CHOWUGLE HOUSE DONA PAULA, TISWADI NIO DONA PAULA. NIO DONA 4 PAULA TISWADI NORTH GOA, GOA 403004. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. DEPT. OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI.
2. THE COMMISSIONER, OF LAND ADMINISTRATION. GOVT. OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATI.
3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, OF VISAKHAPATNAM, COLLECTOR'S MAHARANIPETA, JUNCTION, PARISHAD ZILLA OFFICE. VISAKHAPATNAM.
4. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATAM, VISAKHAPATNAM TOWN ANDDISTRICT.
5. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, COLLECTOR'S OFFICE, MAHARANIPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM.
6. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, (INAMS), 0/O THE RDO., COLLECTOR'S OFFICE, MAHARANIPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM.
7. T V SAI KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, S/O.LATE VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA, R/O.FLAT NO. 302/B, DURGA RESIDENCY, SARADA STREET, DABAGARDENS, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): a Writ of Mandamus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue a direction, order or writ more particularly a Writ in the nature order E-Office No.13098/2018/SDT(1) dated 08.01.2021 passed by the 6th Respondent pursuant to an application purportedly filed by 7th Respondent under Section 3(1) of the A.P. (AA) Inams (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act 1956 (the Act) and consequently issuing of Form-11 Decision under section 3 (3) of the Act vide proceedings in E-Office No. 13098/2018/SDT(1) dated 08.01 2021, as being illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction, offending the provisions of A.P. declaring 5 (AA) Inams (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act 1956 and A.P. (Andhra Area) Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1948 and to consequently set aside the proceedings of the 6th respondent in E-Office No. 13098/2018/SDT(I) dated 08.01.2021 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order of the 6th Respondent in E-Office No. 13098/2018/SDT(I) dated 08.01.2021, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. N ASHWANI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
2. BOLLA VENKATA RAMA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 19104/2022 Between:
1. T.V.SAI KUMAR, S/O LATE T.V.V. SATYANARAYANA, HINDU, AGED 49 YEARS, R/O FLAT NO. 302-B, DURGA RESIDENCY, SARADA STREET, DABA GARDENS, VISAKHAPATNAM ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY(REVENUE DEPARTMENT), SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, ANDHRA PRADESH.
2. THE DISTRICT JOINT COLLECTOR, COLLECTRATE COMPLEX, MAHARANIPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM
3. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, COLLECTRATE COMPLEX, 6 MAHARANIPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM
4. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, BHEEMUNIPATNAM,
5. THE TAHASILDAR, BHEEMUNIPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT
6. THE SPL DEPUTY TAHASILDAR, COLLECTRATE COMPLEX, INAMS, VISAKHAPATNAM ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to direct all respondents not to create encumbrance or make any alienations and effect transactions in respect of the schedule lands in E- office No. 135063 /2018/ SDT(I) dated 03.12.2020 pertaining to Sangivalasa Agraharam Village of Bheemunipatnam Mandal or Visakhapatnam District. and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct all respondents not to create encumbrance or make any alienations and effect transactions in respect of the schedule lands in E- office No. 135063/2018/ SDT(1) dated 03.12.2020 pertaining to Sangivalasa Agraharam Village of Bheemunipatnam Mandal of Visakhapatnam District. and to pass such IA NO: 2 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to Suspend the order.of the 3rd Respondent in D.Dis. No.273/2021, dt. 26-3-2022 and signed on 30-3-2022 pending disposal of the Writ Petition and to pass such IA NO: 3 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased 7 pleased to vacate the interim order dated 05.07.2022 in W.P.No.19104 of 2022 and also dismiss the writ petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the Interim order dated 05.07.2022 passed in W.P.No.19104 of 2022 and dismiss the Writ Petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P SRI RAM Counsel for the Respondent(S):
Operative part
1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following Common Order: In view of the orders passed in the main writ petition i.e., W.P.No.19093 of 2022, no further orders are necessary in these two writ petitions. Accordingly, both the writ petitions are disposed of. Interim orders if any, are deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN
10.08.2026 PND Whether the order is : Speaking ☑ Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable ☑ 8
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, both the writ petitions are disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Ryotwari Act, 1956; Ryotwari Act, 1948; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 10 Aug 2026. The bench was B KRISHNA MOHAN.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.