Baree Durga Prasad v. The State Of Ap & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
In view of the aforesaid submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of,
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. In view of the aforesaid submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders of appeal dated 15.04.2025 preferred by petitioner, after providing due opportunity of hearing within a period 30 days from the date of receipt…
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO:15499/2025 WRIT PETITION NO: Between: Baree Durga Prasad ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Ap and Others The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Petitioner:
#1. RAMANA ALLU Counsel for the Respondent(S): Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR SERVICES I 1. GP FOR SERVICES I HCGR,J W.P.No.15499 of 2025 The Court made the following Order: 2 Heard Sri Ramana Allu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri M.S.R.Chandra Murthy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents.
#2. Petitioner is working as Field Assistant and he has been placed under suspension pending enquiry. Later, after conducting due enquiry, 3rd respondent has passed final orders dated 02.04.2025 terminating the services of the petitioner. Assailing the same, the petitioner preferred an appeal before 2nd respondent on 15.04.2025. The limited grievance of the petitioner is that 2nd respondent is not deciding the said appeal.
#3. Sri M.S.R.Chandra Murthy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that appeal filed by the petitioner would be disposed of within a period of 30 days.
#4. In view of the aforesaid submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders of appeal dated 15.04.2025 preferred by petitioner, after providing due opportunity of hearing within a period 30 days from the date of receipt of the order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN
26.06.2025 MDP
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the aforesaid submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of,
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 26 Jun 2025. The bench was CHALLA GUNARANJAN.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.