THANDAVA CO OP SUGAR LIMITED v. II, THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
Judgment
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including the show cause of Arrest Warrant vide No.GRA/SP/1773/Recovery/Zone-55/2026/974, dated 18.05.2026 issued by the 2ND respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K VENUGOPAL REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
GP FOR INDUSTRIES COMMERCE
The Court made the following order: 3 Aggrieved by the issuance of Notice dated 18.05.2026 issued by respondent No.2 to show cause why a warrant of arrest should not be issued for recovery of an amount of Rs.76,79,957/- specified in Certificate No. GRVSP0001773000/PDCell/Zone-55(1)/RRC/2023-24/196, dated 17.04.2024, the petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition.
2. Heard Sri K.Venu Gopal Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri T.Balaji, learned standing counsel for the Employees Provident Fund Organization appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and Sri Rama Krishna, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Industries appearing for respondent No.3.
When the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks liberty for the petitioner to pay the amount of Rs.76,79,957/- within a period of six (6) months from today. Learned counsel for the respondents opposed for granting six months time, instead requested for four months.
As the petitioner has expressed willingness to pay the subject amount within a period of (6) months, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, is inclined to dispose of the Writ Petition at the stage of admission itself by passing the following order: ‘The petitioner is permitted to pay an amount of Rs.76,79,957/- (Rupees Seventy Six Lakhs Seventy Nine 4 Thousand Nine Hundred and Fifty Seven only) within a period of six (6) months from today. In the event of failure on the part of the petitioner to pay the aforesaid amount within the stipulated period, it is open to the respondents to proceed in accordance with law for recovery of the same. Till expiry of six (6) months period or till payment of the aforesaid amount, whichever is earlier, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner by the respondents.
Operative part
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
18.06.2026 MP ____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 5 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO.15549 OF 2026
18.06.2026 67 MP
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 18 Jun 2026. The bench was RAVI CHEEMALAPATI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.