SIDDUGARI BHAVANI v. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to suspend the orders of the respondent in Ref.A2/1160/2024 dated 27.12.2024 thereby directing 4th respondent to mutate the name of the 6 respondent in respect of petitioner’s land admeasuring Ac. 4.60 cents in survey No; 226-PI in Uppalur Village, Muddanur Mandal, YSR Kadapa District, and pass such IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to suspend the orders of the 3rd respondent in Ref.A2/1160/2024 dated 27.12.2024 thereby directing 4th respondent to mutate the name of the 6 respondent in respect of petitioner’s land admeasuring Ac. 4.60 cents in survey No; 226-PI in Uppalur Village, Muddanur Mandal, YSR Kadapa District, and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct respondents 4 and 7 not to evict the petitioner admeasuring Ac. 4.60 cents in survey No: 226-P1 in Uppalur Village, Muddanur Mandal, YSR Kadapa District and pass such in respect of petitioner’s from her property Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. KODATI RAMYA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent Nos.1 to 5. The issuance of notice to the 6th respondent is dispensed with, as no prejudice would cause to her even if it is disposed of in her absence.

2. This writ petition filed questioning the order of 3rd respondent dated 27.12.2024 allowing request of 6th respondent herein for mutating her name in the revenue records for the subject land covered in it.

3. The learned counsel the petitioner submits 6th respondent is only relying upon the sale deed bearing No.1668 of 1936 dated 11.11.1936 and gift settlement deed No.696 of 1963 dated

19.06.1963. Whereas, the petitioner is in possession and enjoyment of the same with mutation for an extent of Ac.4.60 cents in Sy.No.226-P1 of Uppalur Village, Muddanur Mandal, YSR Kadapa District and the petitioner’s husband mortgaged the property in cooperative society bank also in the year 2011 for availing loan. While so, after long lapse of time, the 6th respondent claimed mutation of her name for the subject property.

4. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 5 submits that this order is a 4 revisable order before the Joint Collector, Kadapa within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of the said order.

5. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the petitioner is permitted to file revision petition before the Joint Collector, Kadapa against the order of the 3rd respondent dated 27.12.2024 by enclosing all the necessary documents in support of her claim within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of this order. On receipt of such revision petition from the petitioner, the Joint Collector, Kadapa District/ the revisional authority shall consider and dispose of the same strictly in accordance with law by hearing all the parties concerned including the petitioner and the 6th respondent giving due opportunity, upon verification of the records and the subject land, appropriate decision shall be taken on its own merits as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four (4) months thereafter. In the meanwhile, there shall be an order of status quo as on today to be maintained with respect to the mutation of names of the parties concerned over the subject land covered under the above said order of the 3rd respondent dated 27.12.2024. In default of filing the revision by the petitioner, the interim protection granted by this court automatically stands vacated.

6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. 5 As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

07.05.2026 NNN _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN