G. HARINATHA REDDY v. STATE OF A P, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 13 Feb 2026
- Bench
- SUMATHI JAGADAM
Outcome
Dismissed
Petition is dismissed as infructuous
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the notice vide Roc.S.D.T/72/2016 date 15.03.2018 issued by the 4th respondents, pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to STAY all further proceedings in pursuance of the land acquisition Award No.24/Compulsory/2017-18, dated 01.05.2017 (Land Acquisition Case No.SDT/72/2016), pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PRAKASH C Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
2. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION
3. GP FOR IRRI AND CAD (AP) 3 The Court made the following
ORDER:
Operative part
Learned counsel for the petitioner appeared through online and submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Dated: 13.02.2026 KAS __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 4 102 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 11224/2018 Dated: 13.02.2026 KAS
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition is dismissed as infructuous
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 13 Feb 2026. The bench was SUMATHI JAGADAM.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.