✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court · 06 Oct 2025

SIKHINAM ARUN BABJI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA4 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 5 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 06.10.2025. UPS 07 6…

Judgment

8.

THOKALA SRINIVASA RAO, R/O. FLAT NO.401, KALLAM TELUGU VELUGU APARTMENTS, NEAR D.I.G. OFFICE, NAGARAMPALEM, GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, by declaring the action of the respondents No.4 and their staff in harassing the petitioner by calling to police station by demanding to settle civil disputes with the 7th responded in the police station i.e., Flat No.401, Kallam Telugu Velugu Apartments, Near D.I.G. Office, Nagarampalem, Guntur City, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh, as illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and violative of Article 14,19 and 21 of Constitution of India, and Consequently, 1) to direct the respondents No.4 and their staff not to harass the petitioner and his family members by calling to the 4th respondent's Police Station by demanding to settle civil disputes i.e., Flat No.401, Kallam Telugu Velugu Apartments, Near D.I.G. Office, Nagarampalem, Guntur City, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh, at the instigation of the 7th and 8th respondents, 2) to direct the respondent. No. 1 to 3 to enquiry the issue and take necessary action against the erroneous police officers/staff who are involving in civil disputes of the petitioner and IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No.4 and their staff not to harass the petitioner and his family members by calling to the 4t' respondent's Police Station by demanding to settle civil disputes i.e., Flat No.401, Kallam Telugu Velugu Apartments, Near D.I.G. Office, Nagarampalem, Guntur City, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh, at the instigation of the 7th and 8th respondents, forthwith and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 3

1.

Dr CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR HOME 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14602 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, by declaring the action of the respondents No.4 and their staff in harassing the petitioner by calling to police station by demanding to settle civil disputes with the 7th responded in the police station i.e., Flat No.401, Kallam Telugu Velugu Apartments, Near D.I.G. Office, Nagarampalem, Guntur City, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh, as illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and violative of Article 14,19 and 21 of Constitution of India, and Consequently, 1) to direct the respondents No.4 and their staff not to harass the petitioner and his family members by calling to the 4th respondent's Police Station by demanding to settle civil disputes i.e., Flat No.401, Kallam Telugu Velugu Apartments, Near D.I.G. Office, Nagarampalem, Guntur City, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh, at the instigation of the 7th and 8th respondents, 2) to direct the respondent. No. 1 to 3 to enquiry the issue and take necessary action against the erroneous police officers/staff who are involving in civil disputes of the petitioner and pass.…”

2.

When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter.

3.

Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance.

Operative part

4.

Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 5 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 06.10.2025. UPS 07 6 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.14602 of 2021 Dated.06.10.2025 UPS

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — arts. 14, 19, 21, 226; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 06 Oct 2025. The bench was VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments