DR. THOTAGIRI BHASKAR v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In that view of the matter, the Criminal Petition is dismissed for non-
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 437, 438, 439, 482
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 s. 528
- Indian Penal Code, 1860
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 09.12.2025. TVN 125 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Crl.P.No.4204 of…
Judgment
Cause title
PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P.AT AMARAVATHI.
2. KADAPATINTIASHIRWADAMMA, W/O. LATE. NANDAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. PARNAPALLI VILLAGE, B.ATMAKURMANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P.STATE. ...RESPONDENT
/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtmay be pleased to Quash the proceedings of FIR in Crime No.181 of 2021, on the file of the B-Atmakur Police Station, Kurnool District for the offence U/Sec.342, 363, 420, 506 r/w. 34 IPC and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to dispense with filing of the original FIR in Crime No.181 of 202, on the file of the B-Atmakur Police Station, Kurnool District and pass such IA NO: 2 OF 2022 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant stay all further proceedings in Crime No.181 of 202, on the file of the B-Atmakur Police Station, Kurnool District for the offence U/Sec.342, 363, 420, 506 r/w. 34 IPC including personal appearance of the petitioner/Accused No.2 and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. RAMESH BABU PEDAPALLI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. JAYA PRAKASH MADASU
2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4204 of 2022
ORDER:
The instant criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘Cr.P.C)/under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) has been filed by the petitioner/respondent, seeking quashment of the proceedings pending against HIM in Cr.No.181 of 2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 342, 363, 420, 506 r/w 34 of IPC of B-Atmakur Police Station, Kurnool District.
None represented for the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the criminal petition.
Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor the respondents attendance.
Operative part
In that view of the matter, the Criminal Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 09.12.2025. TVN 125 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Crl.P.No.4204 of 2022 Dated.09.12.2025 TVN
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In that view of the matter, the Criminal Petition is dismissed for non-
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — ss. 437, 438, 439, 482; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 528; Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 09 Dec 2025. The bench was VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.