KATURI ANJANEYULU v. EXCISE POLICE STATION
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 20 Jul 2026
- Bench
- NYAPATHY VIJAY
Outcome
Dismissed
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed,
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed, as infructuous.
Judgment
Cause title
for re-examination of his medical fitness, and upon confirmation of fitness, promote the petitioner to the post of Sub-Inspector of Prohibition and Excise in any available vacancy, including Bottling Unit, Distillery Unit, Check post, or any Prohibition and Excise Station, with retrospective effect from 10-04-2025. In the alternative, if a disability is confirmed, direct Respondents 1 to 3 to provide reasonable accommodation by transferring petitioner to a suitable post with the same pay scale and service benefits, or place him in a supernumerary post until a suitable post is available or superannuation, as per Section 20(4) of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 and pass such other orders. 3 IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased leased to direct the respondents to consider petitioner’s representations dated 15-04-2025 and 26-04-2025 and meanwhile grant an interim stay on further promotions or postings under Rc.No.68/2024/A2, including Rc.No.68/2024/A2-4, Dated; 10-04-2025 of R5, pending disposal of this Writ Petition, to prevent prejudice to petitioner’s rights and pass such other orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. GALLA RAMA KOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. CH LAXMI NARAYANA
2. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.12690 of 2025
ORDER:
At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication in view of the subsequent developments and no orders are required to be passed.
Operative part
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed, as infructuous.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 20.07.2026 IS 5 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.12690 of 2025 Date: 20.07.2026 IS
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed,
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Disabilities Act, 2016; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 20 Jul 2026. The bench was NYAPATHY VIJAY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.