YADDANAPUDI NAGA VENKATA HANUMANTH PRASAD v. GOURIPEDDI MURALI
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1284/2026 Between:
1. YADDANAPUDI NAGA VENKATA HANUMANTH PRASAD, S/O Y. RAMA KRISHNA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, D.NO.11-770/1,4TH LANE BALAJI NAGAR, BEHIND ID HOSPITAL, AMARAVATHI ROAD, GUNTUR.
2. YADDANAPUDI CHAKRAVARTHI, S/O Y. RAMA KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O 2ND LANE, A.T.AGRAHARAM, NEAR ANJANEYA SWAMY TEMPLE, GUNTUR ...PETITIONER(S) AND
GOURIPEDDI MURALI, S/O LATE DURGA MALLESWARA SARMA, AGED 39 YEARS, R/O D.NO.5-37-174, 4/11 BRODIPET, GUNTUR
NORI BHAVANI, W/O KRISHNAMOHAN, AGED 35 YEARS, R/O D.NO.5-37-173, 4/11 BRODIPET, GUNTUR.
MANDALA VIVEKANANDA REDDY, S/O M. BHASKAR REDDY, AGED 30 YEARS, R/O D.NO.2-14-443, 2ND LANE, SYAMALA NAGAR, GUNTUR.
PAMIDIMUKKALA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED 53 YEARS, R/O D.NO.74-23-26/A, KARIVEPAKU THITA, ASHOK NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA CITY -520007
GUNDUBOINA NAGARAJU, S/O CHINA SUBBARAO, AGED 41 YEARS R/O D.NO.5-42-4, 6/9, BRODIPET, GUNTUR.
KODURU PRADEEP REDDY, S/O GOPALA REDDY, AGED 39 YEARS, R/O ANIKEPALLI VILLAGE, VENKATACHALAM, NELLORE.
THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER ELECTRICAL, NEAR LAKSHMI TALKIES,1ST LANE, BRODIPET, GUNTUR ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to Aggrieved by the Return Endorsement dt.21-04-2026 on the file of V ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE GUNTUR I.A.NO. NIL (UNNUMBERED) in I.A. No. 87 of 2026 in O.S.No.390 of 2014 the above named petitioner begs to present this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition to this Honble Court for the following among others IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with filing of the Certified copy in order dt. 21- 04-2026 I.A.No. NIL file of V ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE GUNTUR (UNNUMBERED) in LA. No. 86 of 2026 in O.S.No.390 of 2014 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay of final decree proceedings in on the file of Civil judge (Senior Division) at Pithapuram and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. C.PANINI SOMAYAJI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. The Court made the following Order: Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the Revision Petition does not survive. Accordingly, the Civil Revision is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J Date:08.05.2026 MJA 79 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1284/2026
08.05.2026 MJA
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 08 May 2026. The bench was R RAGHUNANDAN RAO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.