Andhra Pradesh High Court · 2025
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 14, 19, 21, 226
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 13434/2022 Between:
#1. KAGITA PUNNA RAO, S/O RATNAM, AGE 50 YEARS, R/O. H.NO.1-1581 GADDAMVARIPALEM VILLAGE, KHAJIPALEM POST, P.V.PALEM MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. A N D ...PETITIONER
#1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
#2. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL TOWERS, EDUCATION, IBRAHIMPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, BAPATLA ANJANEYA B-BLOCK, DISTRICT, BAPATLA, ANDHRA PRADESH.
#4. THE MANDAL EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, P.V.PALEM MANDAL, P.V.PALEM, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
#5. Z P H SCHOOL, REP. BY ITS HEAD MASTER, KHAJIPALEM GUNTUR DISTRICT, VILLAGE, P.V. PALEM MANDAL, ANDHRA PRADESH ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, by declaring the action of the respondents No.3 to 5, in not issuing the 7th class passed Marks Memo of the petitioner, as illegal, arbitrary, against revenue laws, against violate of article 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and against the principals of natural justice, consequently to direct the 2 respondents No.3 to 5, to issue the 7th class passed Marks Memo of the petitioner, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No.3 to 5, to issue the 7th class passed Marks Memo of the petitioner fothwith, pending disposal of this writ petition before this Hon'ble court and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate interim order dated on 06.05.2022 passed in I.A.No.l of 2022 in W.P.No. 13434/2022 and dismiss the Writ Petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
#1. Dr CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
#1. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION The Court made the following: 3 O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed to declare the action of respondent Nos.3 to 5 in not issuing VII Class Pass Marks Memo of the petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondent Nos.3 to 5 to issue VII class pass memo to the petitioner.
#2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Bharath Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Dr. Challa Srinivas Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that cause in the Writ Petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous.
#3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
#4. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. 7th August, 2025. DNB ___ ______________ JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 14, 19, 21, 226; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 07 Aug 2025. The bench was K SREENIVASA REDDY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.