KORLEPARA v. THE STATE OF AP, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (STAMP AND REGISTRATION)
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 22 Jul 2025
- Bench
- SUBBA REDDY SATTI
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is Dismissed as Withdrawn
Provisions considered
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 10735/2025 Between:
1. KORLEPARA VENKATA K. KOTESWARUDU, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, TREASURER OF MID VALLEY CITY, FLAT NO. 107, MID VALLEY CITY, ATMAKURU (V), MANGALAGIRI(M), GUNTUR DISTRICT, PIN.522503,A.P. MURTHY, RAMANA S/O ...PETITIONER AND
THE STATE OF AP, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (STAMP AND REGISTRATION) GOVERNMENT OF A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI-522501.
THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, 8C2J PLUS 279, R AND B QUARTERS, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH-522004.
SIVA PRAKASH RAO MUNTHA, S/O RAMA KRISHNA RAO, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/O MID-VALLEY CITY, EVEREST BLOCK, ATMAKUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
GUTTA BALAJI, S/O G.SUBAS CHANDRA BOSE, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O MID-VALLEY CITY, KAILASH BLOCK, ATMAKUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
VASIREDDY NAGARJUNA, S/O V KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/O MID-VALLEY CITY, EVEREST BLOCK, ATMAKUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
VENIGALLA LEELA KRISHNA, V SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O EVEREST BLOCK, ATMAKUR ,MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
J RAMESH, S/O J CHANDRASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O MID-VALLEY CITY, EVEREST BLOCK, ATMAKUR , MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
SAJJAN KUMAR MAAN, S/O SHISH RAM, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O MID-VALLEY CITY, ATMAKUR, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. RR 3 TO 8 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER THE COURT'S ORDER DT.20.06.2025 IN I.A.NO. 02 OF 2025 EVEREST BLOCK, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly, in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to Register the Association pursuant to the Application filed by the Petitioner on 17th April 2025 vide Application No. SCRO12500096810 under The Andhra Pradesh Societies Registration Act 2001 and further hold the in action of the respondents more particularly Respondent No. 2, as violative of Fundamental rights of the Petitioner under Articles 14, 16, 21, and more particularly Article 19 (1) (c) to form an Association under the Constitution of India and further hold the unlawful demands made by the Respondent as illegal, arbitrary and be pleased to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue an interim order or direction, directing the Respondents more particularly Respondent No: 2, to Register the Association / Society vide Application of the Petitioner bearing no.SCRO12500096810, dated 17th April, 2025, pending disposal of the Writ Petition, and be pleased to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners herein to come on record as Proposed Respondent No.3 to 8 in WP.No.10735 of 2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. JAMADAGNI CHITTALA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PRASAD BABU MOGALATHURTI
Operative part
2. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS The Court made the following: ORDER Learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission, as sought for, is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is Dismissed as Withdrawn. No costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous petitions, shall stand closed. PVD ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Writ Petition is Dismissed as Withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Registration Act, 1908; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 22 Jul 2025. The bench was SUBBA REDDY SATTI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.