VEMULA SEETARAVAMMA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 14, 21, 226, 300A
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 11695/2021 Between:
1. VEMULA SEETARAVAMMA,, W/O VENKAIAH, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC.- DAILY WAGE LABOUR, R/O. 6-143, RUNNING ROOM CENTER, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. UPPU JYOTHI,, W/O. ISSAKU, AGED 35 YEARS, OCC- DAILY WAGE LABOUR, R/O. 6-175, SALAM HOTEL CENTER, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. VALLEPU GURAVAMMA,, W/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED 64 YEARS, OCC- DAILY WAGE LABOUR, R/O. 6-123, SALAM HOTEL CENTER, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
4. TIRUPATHI ESWRAMMA, , W/O. NAGESWARA RAO, AGED 30 YEARS, OCC- DAILY WAGE LABOUR, R/O. 6-126/2, SALAM CENTER, NEAR RAMALAYAM, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI.
THE TADEPALLI MUNICIPALITY, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2 HN, J W.P.No.11695_2021
M/S RELIANCE JIO INFOCOMM, REP. ITS AREA MANAGER, R/O.40- 1-72D, 5TH FLOOR, K K TOWES, OPP- HDFC BANK, M.G. ROAD, VIJAYAWADA.
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR GENERAL, TELECOM ENFORCEMENT (TERM), VIJAYAWADA, RESOURCE AND MONITORY CELL ANDHRA PRADESH,
BANDARU SIVAIAH, , S/O. ANJANEYULU, R/O. 6-162, 6TH BLOCK, NEAR RAMALAYAM, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or a direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents, the 2nd respondent gave a permission to the 5th respondent to erect the Reliance Jio RTT (Roof Top Tower) tower without follow the Municipal Laws and without inspection of the building for strengthening and without follow the rules and conditions of the G.O.Ms.No.146 Dt.19.06.2015, which is illegal, Arbitrary and violative of the Article 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India, and violative of the Principles of Natural Justice and also violative of Municipals Laws and seeking to direct the respondents to follow Municipal Laws and remove the RTT tower which is erected on the 5th respondents building IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased take action on our representation/complaint Dated 25.03.2021 pending disposal of the main writ petition respondent to direct the 2nd IA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to amend the name of the 2nd respondent as " The Mangalagiri Tadepalli Municipality, Rep. by its Municipal Commissioner", Mangalagiri, Guntur District, instead of The Tadepalli Municipality, Rep. by its 3 HN, J W.P.No.11695_2021 Commissioner, Tadepalli, Guntur District in main writ petition W.P.No. 11695 of 2021 and pass such other order Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. BATTULA SANJAIAH GANDHI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. P HEMACHANDRA
2. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV 4 HN, J W.P.No.11695_2021 The Court made the following Order:
1. Heard.
2. Both the learned counsels submit that this writ petition is squarely covered by the common order passed by this court in W.P.No.15293 of 2015, dated 04.0.04.2025.
3. In terms of the same, this writ petition is also disposed of and the petitioner is at liberty to re-agitate his grievance before the Principal Secretary to Government IT E & C Department, if so, advised. There shall be no order as to costs.
4. The Registry is directed to append the copy of the order passed in W.P.No.15293 of 2015, dated 04.0.04.2025 to this order. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Date: 06.08.2025 NKA ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 5 HN, J W.P.No.11695_2021 198 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N Writ Petition No.11695 of 2021 Date: 06.08.2025 NKA
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 14, 21, 226, 300A; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 06 Aug 2025. The bench was HARINATH N.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.