B.VIJAYALAKSHMI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION 2. Karri kalyan Durga Prasad SC FOR TUDA 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.10283 of 2024 ORDER:- Sri Y.B.Ramesh, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of learned counsel for petitioner, sought permission of this Court for…
Judgment
SATURDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 10283/2024 Between:
#1. B.VIJAYALAKSHMI,, W/O. G.RAVI KUMAR, AGED ABOUT YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O. 6-70 GAJULAMANDYAM, TIRUPATI URBAN MANDAL, RENIGUNTA, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI (CHITTOOR) DISTRICT. AND ...PETITIONER
#1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
#2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION, TIRUPATI (CHITTOOR) DISTRICT, TIRUPATI,
#3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION, CHITTOOR DISTRICT AT TIRUPATI.
#4. THE TAHSILDAR, TIRUPATHI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUPATI (CHITTOOR) DISTRICT.
#5. THE TIRUPATI URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REP. BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI (CHITTOOR) DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in arbitrary taking possession of the petitioner's land admeasuring Ac.0.10 cents and Ac. 0.10 cents in Sy. No. 114/5 B situated at Cherlopalli village, Tirupati rural Mandal, Tirupati (Chittoor) District for laying of road through the petitioner land without considering the objections of the petitioner or without following the proceedings prescribed under Land Acquisition Act as illegal, arbitrary. Unconstitutional, against principles of natural justice and contrary to the provisions laid down under Land Acquisition Act, 2013 and consequently direct the respondents not to lay the road through the petitioner land as mentioned above without initiating proceedings for Land Acquisition Act or to pay compensation to the petitioner land and pass such pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2024 praying Petition under Section 151 CPC circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to lay the road through the petitioner lands admeasuring Ac.0.10 cents and Ac. 0.10 cents in Sy. No. 114/5 B situated at Cherlopadli village, Tirupati rural Mandal, Tirupati (Chittoor) District without considering the representation dated 04.10.2022 and objections 28-12-2023 as well as without initiating proceedings for Land Acquisition Act or to pay compensation to the petitioner lands pending disposal of the Writ petition before this Hon'ble court and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G V GANGADHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
#1. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION 2. Karri kalyan Durga Prasad SC FOR TUDA 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.10283 of 2024 ORDER:- Sri Y.B.Ramesh, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of learned counsel for petitioner, sought permission of this Court for withdrawal of the writ petition. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Date: 30.08.2025 KBN ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Land Acquisition Act; Land Acquisition Act, 2013; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 30 Aug 2025. The bench was TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.