Mohan Madan Kumar v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 24 Apr 2025
- Bench
- T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
Outcome
Dismissed
In the result, the Criminal Petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 437, 439
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ss. 480, 483
- Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 s. 37
Key paragraphs
- Para 99. In the result, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. //TRUE COPY// Sd/-M SRINIVAS \ ASSISTANT REGISTRAR \ SECTION OFFICER To.
Judgment
Cause title
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Amaravati, Through Station House Officer, Chillakur Police Station. Tirupati District (Chittoor District). ...RESPONDENT
Petition under Section 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C and under Section 480& the circumstances stated in the 483 of BNSS, 2023,praying that Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioners/ Accused No. 2,3 and 4 on Regular Bail in connection with Crime No.3/2025 on the file of Chillakur Police Station,^'' dated; 07.01.2025 This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of
Sri Vajja Chethan Kumar Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Public Prosecutor (AP) on behalf of the Respondent The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.4060 of 2025
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition, u/Sec.480 & 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed by the petitioners/A2 to A4, seeking bail, in Crime No.3/2025 of Chillakur Police Station, Tirupati.
A case has been registered against the petitioners and others for the offence punishable u/Sec.20(b){ii)(C) r/w 8(c) of NDPS Act.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the respondent/State.
Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that, on 07.01.2025 at 2.00 pm, on receipt credible information regarding illegal possession transportation of ganja, the S.l of Police, along with staff and mediators / rushed to Kadivedu center towards Kota Road, and conducted vehicle checking. They found two vehicles bearing registration nos.AP 39 UE 5352 and TN 18 BY 3187 coming from Guduru side. On seeing police, the inmates in the two vehicles stopped their vehicles and tried to escape. Then police apprehended four persons and on enquiry they disclosed their identity particulars as that of A1 to A4. Police found 72 kgs of ganja in their possession. Police arrested them and remanded them to judicial custody and seized the contraband. They confessed the involvement of other accused in the commission of the offence.
Heard. Perused the record. 2 \-
Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that major part of the investigation is completed except filing of charge sheet for want of RFSL A report and prays to dismiss the petition.
Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the petitioners have been in judicial custody since 08.01.2025 and they had permanent abode and prays to allow the petition.
The record shows that the petitioners have been in judicial custody from 08.01.2025. The seized contraband is 72 kgs of ganja which is huge quantity. In view of bar contained under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage.
Operative part
In the result, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. //TRUE COPY// Sd/-M SRINIVAS \ ASSISTANT REGISTRAR \ SECTION OFFICER To.
The Station House Officer, Chillakur Police Station, Tirupati District
2. One CC to Sri Vajja Chethan Kumar Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CC to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. [OUT]
4. Three CD Copies MV HIGH COURT DATED; 24/04/2025 < i 1 ’} ORDER CRLP.No.4060 of 2025 DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In the result, the Criminal Petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — ss. 437, 439; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — ss. 480, 483; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — s. 37.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 24 Apr 2025. The bench was T MALLIKARJUNA RAO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.