Mareedu Sitha Rama Swamy v. Matta Subramanyeswara Rao
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 03 Jul 2025
- Bench
- T C D SEKHAR
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Two CD Copies MKP(gsg) r* HIGH COURT DATED:03/07/2025 ORDER CRP NO. 793 OF 2024 CRP IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 793 OF 2024 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, CRP having been aggrieved by the Docket Order dt: 15.03.2024 passed in E.P.No.34/2018 IN, O.S.No.70/2015, on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Kaikaluru Between: Mareedu Sitha Rama Swamy, S/o Late Sanjiva, Age 58 yrs, Occ Cultivation R/o Kakaravada Village Mudinepalli Mandal, Eluru District ...Petitioner AND Matta Subramanyeswara Rao, S/o Nancharaiah, Age 34 yrs R/o Jinjeru Village Pedana Mandal, Krishna District. Occ Cultivation, ...Respondent lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay of all further proceedings including proposed auction dt; 15.04.2024 in Ep no 34/2018 in OS no in 70/2015 on the field Senior Civil Judge Court in Kaikuluru during the pendency of the above CRP in the interest of justice and Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M P V N V SASTRI Counsel for the Respondent The Court made the following order: / Vi 1 APHC010175892024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3505] (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY.THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 793/2024 Between:
1.MAREEDU SITHA RAMA SWAMY,, S/0 LATE SANJIVA, AGE 58 YRS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/0 KAKARAVADA VILLAGE MUDINEPALLI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND
1.MATTA SUBRAMANYESWARA RAO, S/o Nancharaiah, Age 34 yrs, Occ Cultivation, R/o Jinjeru Village Pedana Mandal, Krishna District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to allow the CRP by set aside the Docket Order dt 15.03.2024 passed in E.P.No.34/2018 IN, O.S.No.70/2015, of SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE. KAIKALURU and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC circumstances stated in the affidavit filed praying that in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including proposed auction dt: 15.04.2024 in Ep no 34/2018 in OS no in 70/2015 on the field senior civil judge court in kaikuluru during the pendency of the above CRP in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.M PVN VSASTRI Counsel for the Respondent:
1. The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 793 of 2024 ORDER: No representation for the petitioner.
2. As can be seen from the e-Courts of District Judiciary, the Execution Petition in E.P.No.34 of 2018 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Kaikaluru was allowed by order dated 01.05.2024 after reporting full satisfaction in view of the memo filed by the decree holder. Therefore, the cause in the present Civil Revision Petition does not survive.
Operative part
3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. i ^ To, //TRUE COPY// Sd/- A VIJAYA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Auaaa^ SECTION OFFICER
The Senior Civil Judge, (Senior Division) Kaikuluru
One CC to Sri M P V N V Sastri Advocate [OPUC]
Two CD Copies MKP(gsg) r* HIGH COURT DATED:03/07/2025 ORDER CRP NO. 793 OF 2024 CRP IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 03 Jul 2025. The bench was T C D SEKHAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.