MULUMUDI PRAMEELA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the abovementioned
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In the above premise, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of this Writ Petition in terms of the abovementioned two Orders of this Court. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the abovementioned two Orders. No order as to costs.
Judgment
Cause title
WEDNESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO: 8271/2026 Between:
1. MULUMUDI PRAMEELA, W/O KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O 46-141-608-203, FLAT NO. 203, SRI KRISHNA TOWERS, NEAR RAMA CHANDRA MISSION, MANAGAMURU ROAD, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. AND ...PETITIONER
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 522238. SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL
2. THE ONGOLE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, ONGOLE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OFFICE, OPP. CHURCH CENTRE, ONGOLE 523001. ...RESPONDENT(S)
: Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SASANKA BHUVANAGIRI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following: 2
ORAL ORDER:
Heard Sri Sasanka Bhuvanagiri, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, Sri M. Srinu Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Municipal Administration & Urban Development and Sri S. Vijay Kumar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri A.S.C. Bose, learned Standing Counsel for Ongole Municipal Corporation.
It is submitted by both the learned Counsel that the issue in the present Writ Petition is squarely covered by two Orders of this Court dated 08.09.2025 in W.P.No.21175 of 2025 and the following Order dated 19.02.2026 in W.P.No.4519 of 2026.
Operative part
In the above premise, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of this Writ Petition in terms of the abovementioned two Orders of this Court. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the abovementioned two Orders. No order as to costs.
Registry is directed to attach copies of both the said Orders along with this Order.
Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:01.04.2026 Vns
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the abovementioned
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 01 Apr 2026. The bench was GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.