J.K. Enterprises Water World v. The State of A P
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- A.P. Wakf Board Act, 1995 s. 53(3)
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
- A.P.Wakf Board Act, 1995 s. 53(3)
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// Sd/- G HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 25931 OF 2013 Between: J.K. Enterprises Water World, having its office at 40-527, R.S. Road, Kurnool- 518004 rep. by its Proprietor Mohammed Abdul Asif S/o. Mohammed Abdul Jabbar, Aged 40 years, Occ; Business, R/o.H.No.40-527, Railway Station Road, Kurnool Town and District. AND ...Petitioner
#1. The State of A P, rep. by its Principal Secretary to Govt. Minorities Welfare (Wakf-ll) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
#2. The State of A P, rep. by its Special secretary to Govt. Minorities Welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
#3. The District Collector, Kurnool, Kurnool District.
#4. The Chief Executive Officer, Building, Nampally Hyderabad. A.P. State Wakf Board, Haj House ...Respondents •Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not sanctioning lease by allotting land to an extent of Ac.27.40 cents in Survey No. 151/1 w f/ Munagalapadu village, Kurnool District in favour of the petitioner for a period of 3 years @ 5% marked value inspite of resolution No. 176/12 dated 24-2012 of 4th respondent and the recommendation and acceptance of 4th respondent vide F.N0.32/REMP/MGP/KNL/11-Z.V dated 18-7-2012 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and also contrary to Section 53 (3) of A.P. Wakf Board Act 1995 and consequential directions to the respondents to accord lease to the petitioner in respect of land to an extent of Ac.27.40 cents in Survey No. 151/1 Munagalapadu village, Kurnool District to the petitioner forthwith lA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 32025 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to accord lease to the petitioner in respect of land to an extent of Ac.27.40 cents in Survey No. 151/1 of Munagalapadu village, Kurnool District to the petitioner forthwith pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V BRAHMAIAH CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI SHAIK KARIMULLAH (SC FOR WAKF BOARD RAYALASEEMA) Counsel for the Respondents No.1, 2: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following order: ■■ APHC010136782013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 25931/2013 Between:
1.J.K.ENTERPRISES WATER WORLD, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 40- 527, R.S.ROAD, KURNOOL-518004 REP.BY ITS PROPRIETOR MOHAMMED ABDUL ASIF S/0.MOHAMMED ABDUL JABBAR, AGED 40 YEARS, OCCiBUSINESS, R/O.H.NO.40-527, RAILWAY STATION ROAD, KURNOOL TOWN AND DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1.THE STATE OF A P, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO DEPARTMENT, MINORITIES WELFARE (WAKF-II) GOVT. SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD.
2.THE STATE OF A P, REPBY ITS SPECIAL SECRETARY TO GOVT. SECRETARIAT, DEPARTMENT, MINORITIES WELFARE HYDERABAD.
3.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
4.THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, A.P.STATE WAKF BOARD, HAJ HOUSE BUILDING, NAMPALLY HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): * Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be land to an extent of Ac.27.40 cents in Survey No. 151/1 pleased toto issue a writ or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1 st respondent in not sanctioning lease by allotting Munagalapadu village, Kurnool District in favour of the petitioner for a period of 3 years @ 5% marked value inspite of resolution No. 176/12 dated 24-2012 of 4th respondent and the recomendation and acceptance of 4th respondent vide F.N0.32/REMP/MGP/KNL/11-Z.V dated 18-7-2012 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and also contrary to Section 53 (3) of A.P.Wakf Board Act 1995 consequential directions to the respondents to accord lease to the petitioner in respect of land to an extent of Ac.27.40 cents in Survey No. 151/I Munagalapadu village, Kurnool District to the petitioner forthwith and to lA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 32025 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to accord lease to the petitioner in respect of land to an extent of Ac.27.40 cents in Survey No.151/1 of Munagalapadu village, Kurnool District to the petitioner forthwith pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.V BRAHMAIAH CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.SHAIK KARIMULLAH (SC FOR WAKF BOARD RAYALASEEMA) 2.SHAIK MOHAMMAD(SC FOR AP WEB)
#3. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following order: Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was listed 09.07.2025, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 3 Despite the writ petition being listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner. It seems the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition.
#3. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// Sd/- G HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,
#1. One CC to SRI V BRAHMAIAH CHOWDARY Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to SRI SHAIK KARIMULLAH (SC FOR WAKF BOARD RAYALASEEMA) Advocate [OPUC]
#3. One CC to SRI SHAIK MOHAMMAD(SC FOR AP WEB) Advocate [OPUC]
#4. Two CCS to GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]
#5. Two CD Copies HIGH COURT % DATED: 11/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 25931 OF 2013 DISMISSING THE WP FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; A.P. Wakf Board Act, 1995 — s. 53(3); Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151; A.P.Wakf Board Act, 1995 — s. 53(3).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 11 Jul 2025. The bench was SUBBA REDDY SATTI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.