PASUPULETI MANIKYAM v. THUMMALAPALLI NAGESWERA RAO

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT NO: 504/1997 Between:

1. PASUPULETI MANIKYAM,, W/O. KAMESWARA RAO HOUSE WIFE P.E.CHINNAYYAPALEM, TUNI (TQ), E.G.(DIST). ...APPELLANT AND

THUMMALAPALLI NAGESWERA RAO, S/O. VEERAMMA, ACHAMPETA, SAMARLAKOTA (MANDAL), KAKINADA (TQ),

THUMMALAPALLI UDAYA BHASKERA RAO, S/O. VEERANNA, ACHAMPETA, SAMARLAKOTA (MANDAL), KAKINADA (TQ),

THUMMALAPALLI VISWANADHAM, S/O. VEERANNA, ACHAMPETA, SAMARLAKOTA (MANDAL), KAKINADA (TQ),

THUMMALAPALLI RANGA RAO, S/O.VEERANNA, ACHAMPETA, SAMARLAKOTA (MANDAL), KAKINADA (TQ),

POSTAL COOPERATIVE BUILDING SOCIETY PRATAPNAGAR, VANGALA KAKINADA,REP.BY ITS KRISHNAMACHARYULU, D.NO. 64-16-43, PRATAPNAGAR, SECRETARY,

ATHILI RAMARATNAM, W/O. SURYANARAYAN MURTHY, BEHIND PADMA PRIYA CINEMA HALL, PERRAJUPETA, KAKINADA, ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal against the judgement and decree dated: 3rd day of July, 1995 in O.S.No. 308 of 1982 on the file of the court of the I Addl. Subordinate Judge, Kakinada IA NO: 1 OF 1996(CMP 3203 OF 1996 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the payment of Lodgement Schedule in A.S.No. 504 of 1995 filed against O.S.No. 308 of 1982 on the file of Court of the Ist Additional Subordinate Judge, KAKINADA, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(ASMP 1851 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 59 days in filing the present application IA NO: 1 OF 2015(ASMP 2349 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order passed in AS No. 504 of 1995 dt. 27-6-2014 by restoring the main appeal and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(ASMP 2894 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased modify the preliminary decree passed in OS No.308/1982 dated 03.07.1995 on the file of the I Additional Subordinate Judge, Kakinada to the effect that the Peetitioner / 6th defendant herein her father and other brothers are entitled to 1/6th share each in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in 2016 (2) SCC 36 Para 23 Counsel for the Appellant:

1. P B NARASIMHA MURTY Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. 2564/M BALANAGA SRINIVAS

2. P DURGA PRASAD

3. 1439/M S R SUBRAHMANYAM The Court made the following: HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Judgment: Appeal Suit No.504 of 1997 When the matter has been posted under the caption “for dismissal”, learned counsel for the respondents present. None appeared for the appellant. It seems that the appellant is not showing any interest to prosecute the matter.