P. Guna Sekhar Naidu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a writ, order dr direction more particularly one in the nature of the writ of MANDAMUS declaring (A) the action of the Respondent No.2 herein in not disposing the Revision Application dated 29.04.2024 filed by the Petitioner herein against the Demand Notice No. 1751/Q2/2011 dated the Respondent No.5 12.04.2024 expeditiously issued herein / - violative sheer arbitrary, unjust, contrary accordance with the law the Rule 35C of the Andhra Pradesh besides „ and 300A ... Const, tut, on of India (B) the action, of the Respondents No. 3 to 6 not issuing the dispatch permit for drawn from land admeasuring 0.732 Katikapalli Village, S.R. Puram Minor Mineral Concession Rules 21 herein in dispatching the Color Granite Mineral Hectares in Sy. No. 247 and 325/P 19(1)g to the object of of the 1966

#14. Mandal, Chittoor District Tb jroTaorl '' the R' ■ """ No 2 aT shelr"''br" Sheer arb, trary, No.2 i:H ixrr Art, cles 14, 19(1)g of the Constitution of India and "at'ed ia the subject matter of Itstein before the Respondent unjust, Irrational and contrary to the Andhra ^ consequently direct thd Cotor Gran, te m,neral drawn from the lease area in accordance with the iaW w,thout reference to the Demand Notice No.1751/Q2/2011 dated 12 04 2^ pending adjudication before the Respondent No.2 herein. jA NO: 1 OF pnri; Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstanced stated in the affidavit filed i may bd pleased to direct the Respondents No. 3 to 6 herein to issue disnatrH perm, fs for dispatching the Color Granite mineral drawn from the lease area in support of the petition, the High Court measunng 0.732 Hectares in Syr^No. 247 and 325/P of Katikapalli Village; uram Mandai, Ch,ttoor D,slrict in accordance with the law without pending reference to the Notice No. 1751/Q2/2011 dated 12.04 2024 adjud, cat, on before the Respondent No.2 herein. jA NO: 2 OF 2091; Petition under Section 151 stated in the affidavit filed i ePC praying that in the circumstances ,n support of the petition, the High Court may be 4 pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 herein Application dated 18.04.2024 filed, by the Petitioner Notice No. 1751/Q2/2011 dated 12.04.2024 i expeditiously. to dispose the Revision herein against the issued by the Respondent No.§ Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. JYOTHI RATNA ANUMOLU Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 6: GP FOR INDUSTRIES The Court made the following: ORDER COMMERCE v - i ■; { APHC010133532025 ?: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] f FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 6939/2025 Between: P Guna Sekhar Naidu ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:

1.JYOTHI RATNAANUMOLU Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.GP FOR INDUSTRIES COMMERCE The Court made the following order: Challenging the inaction of respondent No.2 in not disposing of the Revision Application dated 29.04.2024, filed by the petitioner against the order of the 5 respondent demanding payment of Rs. 19,11,353/- towards normal Seigniorage Fee Consideration amount. Penalty, DMF, etc., the present writ petition is filed.

#2. Heard Smt. Jyothi Ratna Anumolu, learned counsel for the petitioner learned Assistant Government Pleader for Industries and Commerce appearing for respondents. "V

#3. The said revision has been stated to have been filed on 29.04.2024. Since the revision petition filed against the demand raised against the petitioner pending consideration before revisional authority, authorities have not issued a dispatch permit, causing financial prejudice to the petitioner and prayed for disposal of the said revision petition. Pending disposal of the said revision petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a dispatch permit for transportation of the Mineral.

#4. Having regard to the contentions advanced, this Court is of the considered view that, it is appropriate to direct the respondent authorities to dispose of the revision petition and pass appropriate orders within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

#5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// Sd/- M. SRINIVAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR fr^^FFiCER SEC To,

#1. The Principal Secretary (Mines) Industries and Commerce Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi Andhra Pradesh

#2. The Principal Secretary (Mines), Industries and Commerce Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings Velagapudi, Amaravathi Andhra Pradesh

#3. The Director of Mines and Geology, Ibrahimpatnam, Vijayawada, NTR ‘ District, Andhra Pradesh

#4. The Deputy Director of Mines and Geology, Chittoor District 5. The Assistant Director of Mines and Geology, Chittoor District, A.P 6. The District Mines and Geology Officer, Chittoor District, A.P 7. One CC to M/s. Jyothi Ratna Ahumolu, Advocate [OPUC] 8. Two CCs to GP for Industries and Commerce, High Court of Andh ' Pradesh. [OUT]

#9. Three CD Copies. HIGH COURT DATED:21/03/2025 f ORDER WP.No.6939 of 2025 ANDB^ 09 APR 2025 ■s’ ^ . Current Section . Soi DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS