M/S BHAVITHA OUT SOURCING MANPOWER SUPPLY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Judgment
Cause title
TUESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 5863/2018 Between:
1. M/S BHAVITHA OUT SOURCING MANPOWER SUPPLY ASSOCIATION,, 19-4-86, NARAYANA REDDY COLONY, ANANTAPUR, ITS VICE PRESIDENT, THIMMAPURAM MUNAIAH S/O LATE T.SUNDARAIAH, R/O D.NO.2-383, RAGITHOTAPALEM, TADIPATRI, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT REP. BY AND ...PETITIONER
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE (HR-1. PLANNING AND POLICY), SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI. GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S)
: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of Respondent no.2 in considering petitioners plea to give preference to Petitioners Man Power Supplying Agency for supplying outsourcing functionaries to various posts in the Unit of Principal District Judge Court at Anantapur as violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondent no.2 to give preference to Petitioners Man Power Supplying Agency for supplying outsourcing functionaries in various posts in the Unit of Principal District Judge Court at Anantapur and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent no.2 to consider the petitioners Representation dt.02-02-2018 on merits go give to give preference to Petitioner s Man Power Supplying Agency for supplying outsourcing functionaries to various posts in the Unit of Principal District Judge Court at Anantapur and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 2
1. D SESHASAYANA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.5863 of 2018
ORDER:
Operative part
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 02.12.2025 KBN 4 15 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.5863 of 2018 Date: 02.12.2025 KBN
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 02 Dec 2025. The bench was TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.