K LALINI DEVI v. KILLI PURNAVATHI, DIED
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 866/2020 Between:
1. K LALINI DEVI, W/O LATE K. ANANTH RAMAYYA, HINDU, AGED 44 YEARS, R/O D. NO. 38-19-142, 104 AREA, MARRIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM.
2. SMT. S. SHALINI, D/O K. ANANTH RAMAYYA, HINDU, AGED 44 YEARS, R/O D. NO. 38-19-142, 104 AREA, MARRIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
KILLI PURNAVATHI, DIED
YENDA NAGAMANI, W/O LATE Y. SANYASI RAO, HINDU, AGED 58 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 38-19-132, 104 AREA, MARRIPALEM. VISAKHAPATNAM
SMT PYDI MANGAMMA, W/O P. KRISHNA RAO, D. NO. 38-19-132, 104 AREA, MARRIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition against the order and decree dated 01.11.2019 passed in I.A. No. 717 of 2019 in OS No. 439 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the Spl. Session Judge for SC and St Cases-cum- XI Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in OS No. 439 of 2012 on the file of the Spl. Session Judge for SC & ST Cases-cum-XI Addl. District & Session Judge, Visakhapatnam, in pursuance of the orders dated 1.11.2019 passed in IA No. 717 of 2019 in OS No. 439 of 2012, pending disposal of the above CRP, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. ARRABOLU SAI NAVEEN Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. The Court made the following order: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the cause in the instant Civil Revision Petition does not survive.
2. The said submission is placed on record.
Operative part
3. Accordingly the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR Dt.04.07.2025 JLV 23 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR CRP No.866 of 2020 Date 04.07.2025 JLV
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 04 Jul 2025. The bench was T C D SEKHAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.