MORTHA KONDAIAH / KONDA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Petition is dismissed as infructuous
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No.2 to 5 not to interfere over thatched house existing in an extent of Ac.0.05 cents in Sy.No.328-2A, with Assessment No.391 situated at Marripalem Village, H/o. Y.D.Peta Village, Nathavaram Mandal, in the interest of justice pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No.2 and 3 not to issue house site patta in the name of Respondents No. 6 and 7 over an extent of Ac.0.05 cents in Sy.No.328-2A, with Assessment No.391 situated at Marripalem Village, H/o. Y.D.Peta Village, Nathavaram Mandal in the interest of justice, pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass 3 IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To vacate WP.No.5754/2018. interim orders dated 23.01.2018 IA.No. 2/2018 Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P RAJESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
2. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP) The Court made the following
ORDER:
Operative part
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Dated: 21.01.2026 KAS __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 4 159 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 5754/2018 Dated: 21.01.2026 KAS
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition is dismissed as infructuous
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 21 Jan 2026. The bench was SUMATHI JAGADAM.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.