SURYANARAYANA v. GORAVA SHIVAMMA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Hence, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 357/2021 Between:
1. SURYANARAYANA, S / O PENUMURTI MUNEYYA AGED ABOUT 59YRS, R/O KUMBALANURU 2ND CAMP NADICHAGI POST, KOWTHALAM MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND
GORAVA SHIVAMMA, W/O LATE GORAVA MAHADEVA AGED ABOUT 38YRS . R/O H.NO.27/ 145, KUMBALANURU VILLAGE KOWTHALAM MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT
MINOR MALLAMMA, D/O LATE GORAVA MAHADEVA AGED ABOUT 18YRS, OCC. STUDENT R/O H.NO.27/ 145, KUMBALANURU VILLAGE KOWTHALAM MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT
MINOR HARNPAMMA, D/O LATE GORAVA MAHADEVA AGED ABOUT 14YRS, OCC. STLIDENT R/O H.NO.27/ 145, KUMBALANURU VILLAGE KOWTHALAM MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to Aggrieved by the order and decree in CMA No.19/2016, dt.08-02- 2021 on the file of the .II Additional District Judge, Kurnool at Adoni reversing the orders in I.A.No.50/2016 in O.S.No.12/2016, dt.07-04-2016 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Adoni, IA NO: 1 OF 2021 2 BKM,J C.R.P.No.357 of 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order. and decree in CMA No.19/2016, dt.08-02- 2021 on the file of the II Additional District Judge, Kurnool at Adoni pending disposal of the CRP and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. B SARVOTHAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. K RAJANNA 3 BKM,J C.R.P.No.357 of 2021 The Court made the following Order: No representation for the petitioner, inspite of posting the matter under the caption “for dismissal”.
2. On earlier occasion also i.e., on 02.07.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner.
Operative part
3. Hence, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN
16.07.2026 PGT
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 16 Jul 2026. The bench was PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.