POTHIREDDY VENKATA REDDY v. THE STATE OF AP
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to allow change of ownership or transfer of the land to any other purpose and also not to undertake any construction in the petitioners’ land pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. G SRINIVASULU REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION (AP)
2. A JAYANTHI 3 JS,J W.P.No.4525/2019 The Court made the following
ORDER:
Operative part
Learned counsel for the petitioner appearing through online submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survives for consideration and sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Dated: 19.01.2026 RSD __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 4 JS,J W.P.No.4525/2019 25 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 4525/2019 Dated: 19.01.2026 RSD
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — ss. 4(1), 6; Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation Act, 2013; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 19 Jan 2026. The bench was SUMATHI JAGADAM.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.