Y. BALA MUNI REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Writ Petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Considering the submissions made by both the learned counsel, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to workout his remedy before the appropriate forum according to law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto…
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 4 to register the complaint against the respondents 5 to 9 as per the contents of the complaints dated 24.09.2019 filed by the petitioner, pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. D KODANDARAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION NO: 6083 of 2020
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
…pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 in not registering the complaint filed by the petitioner dated 24.09.2019 against the respondents 5 to 9 as illegal arbitrary and violating of Principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to register on the complaint filed by the petitioner on 24.09.2019 against the respondents 5 to 9 and to pass.…
Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri D.Kodanda Rami Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that despite the complaint made by the petitioner on 24.09.2019, no crime has been registered by the police against the unofficial respondents, till date. Learned counsel would further submit that a direction may be given to the respondent-police.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that as the subject matter is civil in nature, no crime has been registered by the police. He further submitted that the Court may pass appropriate orders.
Operative part
Considering the submissions made by both the learned counsel, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to workout his remedy before the appropriate forum according to law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Date: 10th September, 2025 RKS ___________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Writ Petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 10 Sep 2025. The bench was VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.