Munirathnam Reddy Kamasani v. The State OfAndhra Pradesh, (SHO, Tirupati Rural Police Station)
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
Accordingly, the Criminal Petitions are allowed
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 482
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 s. 482
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ss. 3(5), 318(4), 336(3), 338
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Accordingly, the Criminal Petitions are allowed. RAJ U IT RAE //TRUE COPY// To-A The SHO, T\ruPa\= _R^uT^a\ll?^O#^e`sSH\a#=T\ueP#D#i\C\ 2 One CC tO SRI POSANI AKASH, Advocate [OPUCl 3 One CC tO SRI MUTYALA SOBHANADR` NAIDU, Advocate [OPUCl, 4i T=\O= CCcCst=o SpRL BNIL=CTYpARLoAsSEuCbunT^%`R=vi\i h Court Of…
Judgment
occ. software Engineer, R/o.D.No.4-149,Srikrishna Nagar, MuthyalareddyPalli, Tirupathi DI®StriCt, A.P. Respondent No 2 I-S imPleaded as per the Court order dated 24 03 2025 in IANo.1 of2025 in Crl P No 1680of2025. ...Respondent/ De-facto Complainant PetitI'On under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the criminalpetition, the High Court may be pleased to dI'reCt the respondent POll'Ce tO enlarge the petitioners herein (Al and A2) on bail in the event of theI'r arrest in connection with Crime No. 51 of 2025 of Tirupati Rural, Police rf. Station, Tjrupati DI'S{riCt. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and I memorandum of grounds of criminal petition and the orders of the High Court dated.-25-.02.2025, 04.O3.2025,10.03.2025, 24.03.2025, 02.04.2025,
09.04.2025 , 21.04.2025 & 06.05.2025 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of SriPosaniAkash, Advocate for the Petitioner, and of Public Prosecutor for the Respondent, CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2737 OF 202L± Between :
Munirathnam Reddy Kamasani, ,S/o. K Muni Reddy, Aged 45, R/o. GangudupaIIi, Village, Dornkambala, Tirupati.
Divya Maram, W/o. Munirathnam Reddy, Aged 39 R/o. Gangudupalli, Village, Dornkambala, Tirupati. petitioners/Accused 1 & 2 AND The State OfAndhra Pradesh, (SHO, Tirupati Rural Police Station) Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh Buildings, At Amaravati. Respondent/Complajnant Petition under Section 482 of BNSS (438 of Cr.P.C.,) praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent police to enlarge the petitioners herein (Al and A2) on bail in the event of their arrest in connection with Crime No. 93 of 2025 of Tirupati Rural Police Station, TirupatI' District The petition coml-ng on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit fl-led in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of SRI MUTYALA SOBHANADRI NAIDU Advocate for the petitI'OnerS, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent and the court made the foIIowI'ng THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.1680 and 2737 OF 2025 ORDER:- Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the state.
2. Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are arrayed as accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime' NOs.51 of 2025 and 93 of 2025 of Tirupati Rural Police Station, Tirupati District, for alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338 read with 3(5) of BNS.
Learned senior counsel submits that the petitioners are the joint owners of the land which was purchased in lthe auction conducted by APSFC. The petitioners entered into development agreement vide registered deed on
16.12.2022. The share of the petitioners and the builder was also clearly mentioned in the joint development agreement. It is submitted that the, disputes between the petitioners and the land lords arose on account of share of the flats and false complaints came to be filed against the petitioners.
Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits ,that the petitioners are facing allegations in six other cases and has forvarded the list of cases pending against the petitioners.
As seen from the list of cases of the accused, all the cases relates to the same property and the same transaction. Hence, this Court is inclined to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioners, on the`following conditions:- i. ln the event of the arrest, petitioners shall be released on bail on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten -. RE- dg3f-_J, a thousand only) each, with two sureties each for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting police officials. ii. The petitioners shall make themselves available for investigation as and when required and that they shall not cause any threat, inducement or promise to the prosecution witnesses.
Operative part
Accordingly, the Criminal Petitions are allowed. RAJ U IT RAE //TRUE COPY// To-A The SHO, T\ruPa\= _R^uT^a\ll?^O#^e`sSH\a#=T\ueP#D#i\C\ 2 One CC tO SRI POSANI AKASH, Advocate [OPUCl 3 One CC tO SRI MUTYALA SOBHANADR` NAIDU, Advocate [OPUCl, 4i T=\O= CCcCst=o SpRL BNIL=CTYpARLoAsSEuCbunT^%`R=vi\i h Court Of AndhTa PTadeSh [oUT1
5. One SPare COPY `--- ``=-9 * HIGH COURT HN,J DATED :23/06/2025 BAIL ORDERS CRIMINAL PETITION MOS: 1680 & 2737 OF 2025 ALLOWED
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Criminal Petitions are allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 482; Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — ss. 3(5), 318(4), 336(3), 338.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 23 Jun 2025. The bench was HARINATH N.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.