Andhra Pradesh High Court · 2025
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 ss. 10, 12
Judgment
Cause title
27. DAKSHIRAJU SURESH, S/O SRINIVASA RAJU, AGED 28 YEARS, OCC WEIGHBRIDGE ASST. (OUTSOURCING BASIS), R/O DNO 3/40.SIRIGIRACHA PALLI, GOVINDAM PALLI, OBULAVARIPALLI, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, AP-PIN 516105
28. SAKUNALA SREENIVASULU, S/O VENKATARAJU, AGED 41 YEARS, OCC ATTENDER GR. 2 (OUTSOURCING BASIS), R/O D ANNAMAYA NO DISTRICT, AP-PIN 516105 2/169.BOMMAVARAM, OBULAVARIPALLI,
29. SHAIK MUBARAK, S/O SHAIK MAHABOOB BASHA, AGED 24 YEARS, OCC ATTENDER GR 2 (OUTSOURCING BASIS), R/O DNO 10/419-L.M G ROAD, RAILWAY KODUR, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, AP-PIN 516101
30. THOTA GOPALAIAH, S/O VENKATACHALAPATHI, AGED 49 YEARS, OCC WEIGHBRIDGE ASST.( OUTSOURCING BASIS), R/O DNO 4-80A, CHENNARAJUPODU (PAND VI), OBULAVARIPALLI MANDALAM, ANNAMAYYA DIST-AP-PIN-516108 ...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. PRAVEEN KUMAR IAS, SPL. CHIEF SECRETARY, INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT,
2. SRI PRAVIN KUMAR, CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR 5 ANDHRA PRADESH DEVELOPMENT THE CORPORATION LTD., (A GOVT, OF A. P. UNDERTAKING), OFFICE D.N0.294/ID, KANURU, VIJAYAWADA - 521137, N.T.R. DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH, MINERAL
3. SRI M SUDHARSHAN REDDY, CHIEF PROJECT OFFICER, A.P. MINERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., (A GOVT, OF MANGAMPET BAIYTES ANDHRA PRADESH UNDERTAKING), PROJECT, - 516 106, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. BRANCH OFFICE, MANGAMPET ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to summon the contemnors and punish them suitably under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willfully disobeying the interim orders of this Honble Court dated 2.12.2024 in W.P.No.28115/2024 passed such Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. D LINGA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
2. S PRANATHI The Court made the following: ::
ORDER ::
Heard Sri D.Linga Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms. Sowmya, learned counsel representing Smt. S.Pranathi, learned counsel for the respondents.
The above contempt case is filed complaining about the violation of the interim order dated 02.12.2024 in W.P.No.28115 of 2024.
At the hearing, Sri D.Linga Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms. Sowmya, learned counsel representing Smt. S.Pranathi, learned counsel 6 for the respondents would collectively submit that interim order dated
02.12.2024 in W.P.No.28115 of 2024, has been complied with.
Recording the same, the contempt case is closed. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Date: 21.11.2025 SNI ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI 25 7 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 422/2025 Date: 21.11.2025 SNI
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 — ss. 10, 12.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 21 Nov 2025. The bench was SUBBA REDDY SATTI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.