S Nissar v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 482
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 420
Judgment
Cause title
stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in F.I.R No.170 of 2019, dated /
20.07.2019 on the file of the Town Police Station, Kadiri, Ananthapuramu District. lA NO-lOF 2020 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including arrest of the petitioner in crime No.170 of 2019, dated 20.07.2019 on the file of the Town Police Station, Kadiri, Ananthapuramu District, pending disposal of the above Criminal Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner :
Sri Seshadri Goalla Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Public Prosecutor Counsel for Respondent No.3 : None Appeared The Court made the following order: APHC010068222020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION No. 952/2020 Between: S. NISSAR, S/0 KURSHIT SAAB. AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, RESIDING AT 11-82, BANDUSAAB VEEDI KADIRI TOWN ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT ...PETITIONER
/ACCUSED AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH THE PUBLIC AT HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, PROSECUTOR, AMARAVATHI r I.
2.STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KADIRI TOWN POLICE STATION ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. ^
3.K NARESH KUMAR, S/0. K. RAGHUNATH, AGED 29 YEARS, OCC. I^DIRI BRANCH MANAGER, MANAPURAM FINANCE LIMITED, BYPASS BRANCH, KADIRI. ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1.SESHADRI GOALLA ...RESPONDENT
/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The instant Criminal Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed, by the Petitioner/Accused, seeking to quash the proceedings in F.I.R.No.170 of 2019 on the file of Kadiri Town Police Station, Ananthapuramu District for the offence under Section 420 IPC. i 2 rnatter is taken up for 'i^ar/ng, Ms.K.Pr/yanka
When the learned Assistant Public completion of i Prosecutor would '^'^estlgation, filed charge sheet i Lakshmi, submit that the above the Police Recording the same, the
Sri Seshadh the Court fresh petition for petition may be closed. ri Goalla, learned appropriate orders counsel for the Pe by giving liberty etitioner would submit that to the Petition er to file Puashment of the charge sheet submissions made, the Considering (he '*• However, the Petitioner i the charge sheet, it so advised. to file fresh petition Criminal Pehtion i 's closed, seeking quashment Pending applications '^any, shall stand closed. //true copy// assistant registrar To SECTION OFFICER f- The Station House District. Amara^vamlom-I 4' THRPP/n®" 4. three CD Copies. Officer, Kadiri Town Police Station, Ananthapuramu High Court of Andhra Pradesh, '''°®®e“tor, Goalla, Advocate fOPUCJ TK AL HIGH COURT DATED:15/07/2025 ORDER CRLP No. 952 of 2020 CLOSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 420.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 15 Jul 2025. The bench was VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.