RALLAPALLI RAMANA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 19, 21, 226
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Key paragraphs
- Para 88. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this writ petition shall stand closed. Date: 02.03.2026 S D P _______________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM 6 243 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO…
Judgment
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 2 direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to grant interim custody of vehicle bearing No. AP 31W 4359 to the petitioner pending disposal of the Writ Petition and Counsel for the Petitioner:
#1. K NAVEEN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
#1. GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 29068 OF 2017 ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “……..to issue an order, writ or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents in seizing the Vehicle bearing No. AP 31W 4359 of the petitioner without following any procedure under statutes as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 19, 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to release the vehicle from their custody and pass such other order or orders that the Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice….”
#2. Heard Sri K.Naveen Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms.M.Anusha, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Mines and Geology appearing for the respondents.
#3. Apparently, at the stage of admission, this Court granted interim order on 30.08.2017 directing the respondents to release the seized vehicle of the petitioner subject to the condition of furnishing third party security to the satisfaction of the competent authority and with anundertaking that the seized vehicle shall not be alienated pending disposal of the writ petition.
#4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Mines & Geology appearing for the respondents brought to the notice of this Court about the new rules made under G.O.Ms.No.100 Industries & Commerce (Mines-II) Department dated 26.06.2025 issued by the Government of Andhra Pradesh. However, 4 she fairly submits that based on the interim directions of this Court, the seized vehicle had been handed over to the petitioner towards interim custody.
#5. At this juncture, it is apt to note the relevant Rule 19(a) (b) prescribed in G.O.Ms.No.100 Industries & Commerce (Mines-II) Department dated
26.06.2025 issued by the Government of Andhra Pradesh, as under:- “(19) Offences and Penalties: a) In the case of the vehicles engaged in illegal/ un-authorized excavation in the prohibited areas (i.e. within 500 meters from the Ground water structures, Bridges, Dams, Railway lines and cross drainage structures etc.), transportation of sand outside the State and found transporting sand without valid permit shall be penalized as follows: Vehicle Type First Time (In Rs.) Second Time (In Rs.) Tractor Lorry fitted with upto 10 tires capacity Lorry fitted with above 10 Machinery Upto 10,000/- Upto 25,000/- Rs. 10,001 to 20,000/- Rs. 25,001/- to 50,000/- Upto 50,000/- Upto 50,000/- 50,001/- 50,001/- Rs. 1,00,000/- Rs. 1,00,000/- b) Any vehicle transporting sand, if found, carrying sand in excess of the quantity specified in Sand transit form /invoice or in excess of quantity permitted by the Transport Dept., penalty shall be levied on such excess quantity @ Rs.2000/- per MT c)…………. d)………….. e)…………… f)…………… g)…………..”
#6. Whereas Rule 20 deals with the appeals, and further Rule 21 of the G.O.Ms.No.100 Industries & Commerce (Mines-II) Department dated
26.06.2025 relates to the powers to issue orders/clarifications/ guidelines. 5
#7. In view of the aforesaid circumstances, liberty is given to the respondents to initiate appropriate steps in terms of procedure enunciated under Rules 19, 20 & 21 of the G.O.Ms.No.100 Industries & Commerce (Mines-II) Department dated 26.06.2025 issued by the Government of Andhra Pradesh.
#8. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this writ petition shall stand closed. Date: 02.03.2026 S D P _______________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM 6 243 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No: 29068 OF 2017 Date: 02.03.2026 S D P
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 19, 21, 226; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 02 Mar 2026. The bench was MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.