GURRAM VENKATA PRASADA RAO v. TALAPANENI VENKATADRI, Sio lakshmaiah
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interim order granted, if any, shall stand vacated. Consequently, all pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, shall stand closed in terms of this order. _____________________________________ PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI,J…
Judgment
Cause title
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 554/2019 Between:
1. GURRAM VENKATA PRASADA RAO, S/O SIVAJI, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/ O 10/3, ARUNDALPET, GUNTUR CITY. ...PETITIONER
AND
1. TALAPANENI VENKATADRI, Sio lakshmaiah, Aged about 38 years, R/o 1/3, Kakumanuvari Thota, Guntur. ...RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to aggrieved by the order and decree dated 31.10.2018 passed in E.P.No. 43 of 2017 in O.S.No. 976 of 2008 by the learned IV Additional Senior Civil Judge, Guntur, IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To stay all further proceedings in pursuance of the order dated 31.10.2018 passed in EP.No. 43 of 2017 in OS.No. 976 of 2008 by the learned IV Additional Senior Civil Judge, Guntur pending disposal of the CRP and tpass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V SURYA KIRAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent:
1. 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 554/2019
ORDER:
Sri V. Surya Kiran Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the present Civil Revision Petition has been filed against E.P.No.43 of 2017 before the Trial Court, has been decreed. As per section reported that said E.P has dismissed for default and the cause does not survive in/ the present Civil Revision Petition.
Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interim order granted, if any, shall stand vacated. Consequently, all pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, shall stand closed in terms of this order. _____________________________________ PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI,J Dated: 16.07.2026 BSM 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 554/2019 Dated: 16.07.2026 BSM
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 16 Jul 2026. The bench was PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR, ADDITIONAL SENIOR, CIVIL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.