SRI PARAMESWARA HIGH SCHOOL, RAMARAJU PALLI, ITS v. THE UNION OF INDIA, THORUGH REGIONAL DIRECTOR, ESI
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 05 Jan 2024
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 226
- Income Tax Act, 1961
- ESI Act, 1948
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Judgment
Cause title
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 2971/2024 Between:
1. SRI PARAMESWARA HIGH SCHOOL, RAMARAJU PALLI, ITS KADAPA DISTRICT. REP BY PULIVENDULA ROAD, CORRESPONDENT K.PRAMESWARA REDDY S/O NAGI REDDY,AGED 66 YEARS,RAMARAJUPALLI VILLAGE. BUILT- UP, PULIVENDULA ROAD, KADAPA DISTRICT, ...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE UNION OF INDIA, THORUGH REGIONAL DIRECTOR, ESI KRISHNA EMPLOYEES STATE HOSPITAL ROAD, GUNNADALA,VIJAYAWADA, DISTRICT. INSURANCE CORPORATION ,
2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, EMPLOYEES 77/A,VARADARAJA NAGAR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT INSURANCE CORPRORATION, AUTHORIZED OFFICER, D.NO.6-1-
3. THE RECOVERY OFFICER, SUB-REGIONAL OFFICE, TIRUPATI, D.NO. 1-1-77/A,VARADARAJA NAGAR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S)
: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3 rd respondent in 2 issuing the impugned show cause Notice No. 79000306540001302, dated 5-1-2024 for payment of Rs.24,18,538, under Rule 73(1) of Second Schedule of Income Tax Act 1961 as illegal, arbitrary, violation of principals of natural justice and violations of Article 14 , 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the impugned proceedings No. 79000306540001302, dated 10-1-2024 issued under the ESI Act 1948 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent 3rd respondent to dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 22-1-2024 pending disposal of the main W.P. and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. B S VENKATA RAMESH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. K SANGAN NAIDU
2. O UDAYA KUMAR (CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL) The Court made the following: 3
ORDER:
Operative part
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. Date: 13th August, 2026 RKS _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 226; Income Tax Act, 1961; ESI Act, 1948; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 05 Jan 2024.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.