PIDATALA SRIDEVI v. THE STATE OF AP

Cause title

1. PIDATALA SRIDEVI, W/O RAMI REDDY, AGED 56 YEARS, 8-493, OCCUPATION.HOUSEWIFE, ALMAASPET, KADAPA TOWN, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT D.NO. R/O ...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, LAND AND REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, V ELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA

4. THE TAHSILDAR, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA. ...RESPONDENT(S)

: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the Endorsement Ref. No. A1686/2018 dated 31.01.2019 and the action of the 4th Respondent in not considering issue Pattadar the petitioner's application and Passbooks in respect of petitioner’s land admeasuring Ac 1.88 cts in Sy. No. 352 at Chinnachowk Village, Kadapa District as illegal, unwarranted, highhanded, unconstitutional, deliberate, rejecting 2 unsustainable, arbitrary against Law as well as principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the same and direct the respondents to issue Pattadar Passbooks and record the name of the petitioner in their records in respect of petitioner land. IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings Endorsement Ref. No. A/686/2018 dated. 31.01.2019 of 4th respondent by directing to issue Pass Books in respect of the petitioner's land admeasuring Ac 1.88 cts in Sy. No. 352 at Chinnachowk Village, Kadapa District. Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. K B RAMANNA DORA Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following 3

ORDER: