✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court · 17 Jul 2026

N RAMESH v. THE STATE OF AP

Writ Petition No. 1896 of 2026III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT, SESSION, SPECIAL2 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed, as withdrawn

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed, as withdrawn.

Judgment

Cause title

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

WRIT PETITION NO: 1896/2026 Between:

1. N RAMESH, S/O. LATE PULLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, R/O. NARISIPATNAM, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR TRANSPORT, ROADS SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, DISTRICT. 2.

2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, ANTI-CORRUPTION BUREAU VIJAYAWADA. ...RESPONDENT(S)

: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the orders passed in 1st respondent in G.O.Rt No.35 dated 16-09-2025 is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of 2 India and to consequently set aside the same and to pass such other orders. IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceeding pursuant proceedings in C.C. No.53/2025 on the file of III Additional District Session Judge cum Special Judge for ACB Cases at Visakhapatnam pending disposal of the writ petition. to G.O.Rt.No.35 dated 16-09-2025 including IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to vacate the Interim order dated: 27.01.2026 passed in W.P.No.1896 of 2026 in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. V V SATISH Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. S.SYAM SUNDER RAO SC cum Spl P.P. For ACB

2. GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following: Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.1896 of 2026

ORDER:

1.

In view of the Memo vide WPUSR 74282/2026, dated

14.07.2026 filed along with the letter dated 06.07.2026 addressed by the learned counsel for the Petitioner addressed to the Registrar (Judicial), the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition.

2.

Permission is accorded.

Operative part

3.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed, as withdrawn.

4.

No costs.

5.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. Date: 17.07.2026 IS ________________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.1896 of 2026 Dated: 17.07.2026 IS

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed, as withdrawn

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — arts. 14, 226; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 17 Jul 2026. The bench was III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT, SESSION, SPECIAL.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 1896 of 2026). ← Search more judgments