PAUSPULA MAHESH v. M/S BUILDERS DEVELOPERS, A PARTNERSHIP FIRM
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 16 Apr 2026
- Bench
- RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. In view of the above, this Civil Revision Petition filed questioning the orders passed in an I.A. in the said suit becomes infructuous .
- Para 55. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. BRS _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI,J
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 108/2024 Between:
1. PAUSPULA MAHESH, S/O. LATE KRISHNAYYA, AGED 46 YEARS, LINE, BALIGHATTAM, R.D.NO.3-225/1, SARADA NAGAR, NARSIPATNANN, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND
M/S M V V BUILDERS DEVELOPERS, A PARTNERSHIP FIRM, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, SRI. M.V.V. SATYANARAYANA, S/O. LATE RAGHUNAIKULU, HAVING OFFICE AT MIG-26, D.NO.4-62-1, PLOT NO.21, LAWSONS BAY COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM
VALLANKI SRINIVAS RAO, S/O. LATE VELLANKI RANGA RAO, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O. MOGALIRAJAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to begs to present this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition aggrieved by O.S.No.242/2022on the file of Court of I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam the Order, dt.13.10.2023 I.A.No.764/2022 IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased be pleased to grant temporary injunction restraining the Respondents from creating any third party interest or making developments in the suit schedule property until disposal of this Civil Revision Petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SODUM ANVESHA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. The Court made the following order: This Civil Revision Petition is filed questioning the legality and correctness of the order dated 13.10.2023 passed in I.A.No.764 of 2022 in O.S.No.242 of 2022 by the learned I Addl Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam.
2. No representation for the petitioner.
The case status information placed on record by the Registry shows that the suit in O.S.No.242 of 2022 was dismissed as not pressed on
12.11.2025.
In view of the above, this Civil Revision Petition filed questioning the orders passed in an I.A. in the said suit becomes infructuous .
Operative part
Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. BRS _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI,J
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 16 Apr 2026. The bench was RAVI CHEEMALAPATI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.