N SUNDARAIAH v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased suspend ROC.No.2887/2024-A2 dt.27.11.2024 issued by Respondent No.4 and restore the cheque drawing powers of the petitioner, pending disposal of the above writ petition pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass impugned order Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. V VINOD K REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):

GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 3 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents.

This writ petition was filed questioning the action of respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not considering the representation of the petitioner dated 25.11.2025 submitted to the 4th respondent and F-Line Application No.FSNV012500864888 dated 22.11.2025.

On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the written instructions from the 4th respondent dated

09.02.2026 submits that the petitioner submitted F-Line application through Sachivalayam dated 22.11.2025 specifically for Sy.No.56-5A of Rushikonda Village but not Sy.No.56-11. The said F-Line application was duly received and processed by the office of the Tahsildar, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal. The field verification was conducted by the Mandal Surveyor of the office of the 4th respondent with reference to the village records and ground position. The Mandal Surveyor categorically reported that the land shown by the petitioner does not fall within Sy.No.56-5A, for which the F-Line application was filed and the petitioner is not in physical possession of the land shown by him including the land claimed in Sy.No.56-11. Basing on the said survey report, the Deputy Tahsildar, Visakhapatnam Rural issued an endorsement dated 09.12.2025 stating that the boundaries could not be 4 shown and survey could not be done, as the land claimed by the petitioner was not under his physical possession. Thus, the petitioner’s F-Line application was considered, verified on the ground and disposed of in accordance with law and the decision was duly communicated.

In reply, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the copy of the endorsement dated 09.12.2025 was not received.

In view of the above said facts and circumstances, no relief can be granted in this writ petition as no cause survives. The copy of the endorsement

09.12.2025 the Deputy Tahsildar, Visakhapatnam Rural may be sent again to the petitioner. It can be collected by the petitioner also.